Search results for query: *

Puppy Power 3

So, just think how many rucks are off the board between pick 1 and pick 28..😁

Getting a bit worried about Cro19 . Last seen Friday afternoon in BF.

So, am I Pick 1?😇

Mr Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda strikes again. :D

That is similar to what I proposed above, except I suggested hitouts should only be worth 1, as it's a category that only ruckmaen can score in, and that contested marks should be rated higher than ordinary training drill type marks due to the degree of difficulty. But all good.

Okay, what about ratings of 2 for score, kicks, handballs, tackles and contested marks, and ratings of 1 for ordinary marks, hit outs, spoils, clearances and/or disposal efficiency. Would that make the rankings better?

Interesting. It lessened rucks slightly but also smacked midfielders around a fair bit

I've removed my vote for clearances, so now clearances and disposal efficiency are tied. Be interested yo see what the rankings look like if disposal efficiency replaced clearances in the chosen 9.

I also find that category system is more team based whereas points systems favours individual players more. Your team in category needs to be strong overall rather than just having disposal magnet midfielders.

Cro19 Deadly Darcy flaps Barrybran Bowski

Sorry, didn't realise that.

Makes it a bit difficult to define key fwds and backs when keeper platform doesn't separate them

Tackles in twice?

Agree, need tackles in poll

Maybe just add disposal efficiency and contested marks to keep it odd number. All on one.

I'm happy to go along with whatever is decided, (as long as Zim picks his mate Jimmy Webster with his 1st)

The dates look good to me but the Draft start date is dependent on Keeper being ready for it

Also happy with player list. Looks much better.

I do like this. At present we are weighted heavily towards key forwards (who thinks Treacy should be ranked number 1?).

I do like contested marks as these are more valuable than the piddly keepings off type marks at the end of 4th quarter. But I'll go with the flow.

For 14 coaches

Check my post on pg 6.

The space has been filled, but we'll put tou on the list for 3 leagues now that are currently operating. Wise Guy Sam

Also Zim has a few oldies on his team so he probably needs a few extras to help push the wheelchairs.;)

I'm a bit unclear on what this means. Can you pick up players that others have delisted or just those that you, yourself have either not included on your keepers?

I do like this idea, as it would reduce the number of donuts for these rounds. Also we need to decide on player pool swaps allowed. I don't mind on 0, 5, or 10 during the season, as long as there in some restriction. If there is no restriction, the obvious tactic would be to have say 15 or so...

I like your thoughts on squad size, draft and scoring. All sound pretty good to me. Just on positions though, I think it may work better having only 5 defenders, but making 6 midfielder, keeping total on field the same at 22. In the existing leagues, we always seem to be scratching around for...

Yea, I agree on Snake Draft. We want to keep teams as even as possible for 1st season to avoid coaches dropping off in interest.

I think we should wait to see who you pick in your team and then decide the categories.😜