I have no idea who to trade for McKercher:
Collingwood have Geelong this week to Crisp should be good.
Essendon have a good run for Defenders coming up so Nic Martin should be good too.
In the midfield, Green has Richmond and Serong is the middle of a very juicy run.
Plus, McKercher's...
Thinking either one of Green / Crisp / Martin down to McKercher and a rookie downgrade to Mannagh to bank 300-400k for next week to get final rookie off field. Or see what I can do with a one up one down in the forward line and not get McKercher. What do we think?
Left 11 points on the table with electing Gulden over Ryan. But 11 points isn't the end of the world. That's exactly why you take a risk on a 100 VC, you don't lose much if your captain choice doesn't get injured or have a truly awful game.
How does anyone not think Cripps is the best player in the game.
Today Bont was tagged like a dog and gave up until the last quarter when they were 40 points down and stole a late goal or two.
Meanwhile Cripps is dominating and kicking them when they count.
He's a fking superstar.
Bontempelli is the biggest coward. Drops a 50 point quarter when the game is over and the other side has subbed off their best player. ****ing disgusting.
Cripps is 10x the player this fraud is.
Completely right. And anyone who says otherwise just highlights that they're a barracker supporting their colours. The Democrats could have easily codified it. They choose not to because they use it to win elections. It's the driving factor behind the majority of their policies. Surprise...
Drinker does definitely try to be a Plinkett style review with similar random jokes about made up horrific personal lives, which I find lame.
As I said.. about 50% of his criticism I disagree with and think he's wrong on. 50% is usually pretty accurate though.
Darcy Moore and Billy Framptom might be the worst 1-2 punch key backs in the lead. **** me they're both awful one on one. They got embarrassed tonight by a third gamer, a failed midfielder and a 2m tall freak.
I don't agree with every one of their points, and sometimes they interpret things wrong or get nit picky, but the majority of the time its funny as hell. I thought the audio description bit in Nerdrotics video was actually hilarious.
I never said slave Leia was "banned" I said the KK crew jibber jabber on about Star Wars not "objectifying" women moving forward. The whole point is that they're hypocrites.
Because it elevates the primary purpose of the show - making a good story. If it doesn't elevate it then I think it's just diversification for diversifications sake which is what you helpfully summarised my position about above. If it elevates the story then I don't think it's just for...
"Story" in this sense is existing story. People can make whatever stories they want about whatever people they want and I champion that, again I am not, and I don't think anyone who is anti-'woke' is anti representation or diversity and I watch a broad base of cinema, particularly a lot of Asian...
To be honest I think i fell asleep during the rock scene of EEAAO, but i'd had a long day when I saw it. With that caveat, no, i don't recall thinking "this is woke". Why would you think people thought it was woke? To the extent it needs clarification (it shouldn't) that something isn't woke...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.