Search results for query: *

Sounds very much like the Vlaustin scenario at the Tiges. Thought we'd picked up a gun midfielder for the future, didn't make it there, turned into a pretty handy backman.

Could we possibly look to trade down if the player/s that we are targetting at 10/11 are off the board? If Sydney offered 19 and 22 for 11 would it be worth it? I would definitely take a trade if GWS offered 16 and 21 for 10 as they normally will trade to get to the player that they want.

I don't think that Tauru will make it to 6. Dees have May and McDonald at 32 and just dumped Tomlinson. Petty is always half way out the door and they want to play him forward. They have to pick up Tauru at 5 don't they, otherwise it's Lever and who in the future?

Even if we **** up half of the picks then that would still be 4 top players to start the rebuild.

He is a gun but I'm not sure if Collingwood need another HBF, and they picked up 2. If they had done what Hawthorn had managed and picked up Battle and Barrass then they would have knocked it out of the park. Instead they are paying about $1.8m per year for 2 HBF and haven't covered the holes...

When Benny Gale became CEO, apart from his 75-0-3 mantra that everyone laughed at but came to fruition, he stated that Richmond would not ask for any priority picks, as we got ourselves into the mess we were in and it was up to us to get ourselves out. Asking for priority picks is a loser...

It doesn't matter how good he is. He's a HBF. If the Wobblers got Barrass and/or Battle then they would have exactly what they needed. Perryman and Houston don't make them any taller in the backline.

I think we should trade 11 to Sydney for 19 and 22. That would give us 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 and 24. We should then use our full allotted time for each pick including asking for extensions on a couple just to annoy the hell out of everyone.

About half the posts that most people on here have written. Any more than half and you are just a try hard :think:

I'll be very happy as a Wolves fan once this weekend is over. Once we play City it will mean that in the first 8 games we will have played 6 of last years top 7 with the other 2 games away at Forest and Brentford. Hopefully we can start getting a string of results against teams around where we...

I believe that they give each player a score of 0-5 for each game. Having only won 2 games for the season there would have been a lot of 0-2 votes in most games and bugger all 5 vote games.

So what you are saying is that in an average draft, where kids missed up to 2 years of development due to COVID, the Pick #9 could be a gun, pick #17 will be a regular first team player and there are question marks about the 3 kids we picked up in the late 20s? Well strike me down with a...

Well let's try another player. Kamdyn McIntosh played most games this year and wants to stay at Richmond. He has been very loyal to the RFC. He was obviously best 23 for us as he was played when he was fit, yet RFC haven't offered him a new contract. Is the RFC being disloyal and disrespectful...

The major issue I have is for blokes like Blakey. If we are going to have father-son then this should take precedence over any Academy picks. Do you think that Blakey would not be playing football if it wasn't for the Swans Academy? If you are a F/S then this should be the only consideration. If...

Is Robbie Fox from WA?

If you didn't lose Schultz you wouldn't have #9. I'm not going to be like a lot of my colleagues. I will just ask you to re-read what you just wrote and then reconsider your retort.

Freo people are just overthinking this. How does this sound for a trade? Freo get a past #34 and Bolton. Richmond get pick 9 and pick 10. Freo give up pick 10 and Lachie Schultz. How fair does that sound? We all know that there's only one team that gets shafted here and they deserve everything...

After seeing some of the votes that the umps gave they probably mixed him up with Max Holmes.

Sounds pretty much like Thomson Dow for the Tiges, except most fans want him gone. Unfortunately we had no-one to take his spot as they were all injured.

What's wrong with what Richo said? They probably do play for him. The problem is that the players aren't good enough and the game plan was crap. Bombing it into Dixon, Esava and Georgiades may look good in theory but Dixon can't mark any more, Esava is a bigger version of Frampton and Georgy is...

Imagine the Vic Bias next week if the Granny is between South Melbourne and Fitzroy? Absolutely outrageous 😳 🤪🤪

Don't forget that we bid on Hipwood (at 15 I think) and Brisbane matched

Have you tried warm milk with a bit of honey?

If he's a small forward with minimal defensive effort then Dimma won't be interested in him. No.1 pre-requisite for a small forward in Dimma's team has always been forward pressure. If you don't have that then you don't play.

He only ran into his biceps. How do you knock yourself out running into a stationary man's arm? When you have a helmet on?

If we can't get 9+10 out of Freo for Bolton then I would we accept 9+17+O'Driscoll. I really rate O'Driscoll and he would be a perfect replacement for Rioli.

Richmond had close to the worst forward line in 2017 as far as names go. Yet we dominated finals due to the team work and how well the guys interacted. So yes, Chris Scott is doing a great job, however much I hate to admit it.

Our home game was at 1pm on Sunday arvo at which time we had won 1 game out of 8 and you guys were doing OK. The Freo home game was Saturday night when we had won 2 games and Freo were looking at top 4. Who's numbers are more disappointing?

Oh and Jacob Blight. We should just keep him. We're losing enough players. Give him a 2 year deal and a full professional pre-season and see what he has.

Yep, the main problem with Jack Graham isn't really Jack Graham. It's the club putting him back into the starting 22 as soon as he can stand up after another injury. Half of our list have 2-4 week injuries and they are out for 10 weeks. Jack Graham has 6-8 week injuries and is back in 2.