Search results for query: *

Melbourne vs Gold Coast 2011 Half a metre from Nathan Ablett about to line up for goal a guy shouts "You shoulda stayed retired Ablett" He missed the goal and I don't think he ever played again after that.

So you agree that there is no need to fully understand something before referencing it as fact?

Good point... new title for this thread. "Plenty of evidence... no proof or substantiated claims against Melbourne re: tanking" Happy now?

That article says 60 witness statements. i.e. Witnesses made more than one statement. Not 60 witnesses that made statements. i.e. 60 individual witnesses. I hope you're the prosecutor... we'd be home and hosed.

I did not say it was not evidence. Read my post properly. I wrote that stating "Everyone knows there is evidence." is not evidence. I did not say what was certainly the contents of the dossier. I gave my opinion, as does everyone else here. My opinion stands - the report contains opinion...

About 1000 pages of opinion, hearsay and speculation with some already known facts mixed in. Saying "Everyone knows there is evidence." is not evidence. It's an opinion. Opinion does not allow the AFL to lay charges. I hope that helps you.

Can you email me your copy of the AFL report please?

Why?

Go Unicorns!

Dawes. I'm hoping for a solid year from the big fella with a blinder against Collingwood on QB.

Hi there. New here.... Not new elsewhere. I look forward to occasionally posting my own thoughts here when shouting them over the boundary line at the MCG does not help me feel better. Cheers.