Ah yes, I said many months ago that an insurer would not have agreed to pay James Hird's legal bills on pursuing the federal court matter. The above poster thought I was wrong. I guess the current claim by Hird against his insurer would suggest that I was right!
I would strongly doubt that an insurer is footing the bill for Hird's appeal. Insurers don't generally throw money around to fund speculative legal proceedings. They also wouldn't rely on Hird's legal advice and would obtain their own.
Everyone is also operating under the assumption that...
Hi, long time reader, have never posted before. Have supported the hawks since I was a child as have family in Victoria but grew up in NSW and Qld so also have a love of rugby union and most sport to be honest. Living in Sydney.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.