Search results for query: *

The family birth notices indicate 'LVE' is much older than BVE and that the nephew had been of driving age for some years.

It's in Banquet and it is correct.

He doesn't have a younger brother. I think you are referring to one of his older brothers.

It doesn't appear the OP provided any justification or support for their proposition.

Could you please explain the relevance of this to the original post?

Where are the reports of the 'group including BVE being seen at a cafe' that you refer to? That is not in any of court evidence.

I believe you cannot hold a criminal trial as the dead would be unable to present evidence in defence. There may be other mechanisms (eg the coroner's court) with different powers.

I can direct you to the following sources. Thebarton Boys Technical School - yearbook 1962 - BVE completed Intermediate in 1961. R v VE [1984] - he left school after Intermediate

They were not.

Hia father was born in Australia. Can you cite your source that he went overseas during the war and enlisted for the enemy?

I don't think Thebarton Boys was considered 'an elitist private school'.

Have you mixed him up with someone else?

Plenty of places rented without a 'formal lease' in that era. Nothing in writing, paid cash to the landlord when they dropped around, no bond etc.

As John said, it's in the trial transcript. I am not free to share the actual documents.

The apple material was comprised of skin and flesh and some was in relatively large, ie 1cm undigested, pieces.

Pearman indicated at trial that the corn starch was consistent with Corn Flakes. He also detected the presence of a protein that gave a similar reaction to tests of milk, which would reinforce the likelihood the source of the corn starch was corn flakes.

It was acknowledged in court that the photo used by the media had been taken prior to Richard's last haircut. This may have been the source, years later, of this story (hearsay) that his hair hadn't grown or had been cut.

Martin prosecuted both Von Einem cases.

Many suppressions associated with the VE cases are from the 1990 committal and are on the grounds of potential prejudice to the proper administration of justice, as such people were argued to be potential witnesses if VE was committed for trial for Barnes or Langley. Given the strong arguments...

Apologies. I thought the names of the victims were self-explanatory!

Are you saying that the Mullighan Inquiry covered the deaths of AB/NM/PS/ML/RK? None of these were stated to be 'abused in state care'. Can you provide a source for this claim?

As far as I can ascertain, the only link between VE and the Oval abduction is Mr B's suggestion part way through the 1990 trial for the murder of Barnes/Langley that VE told him about abducting kids from 'the football' and taking kids from the beach. This claim didn't hold up well under cross...

Manock didn't give evidence in Von Einem [1984] (the Kelvin case). James was cleared of the unprofessional conduct charges on appeal. My understanding is that at that time of Kelvin's death and Von Einem's trial, James and Manock worked relatively autonomously in the discharge of their...

James, independently of anyone else, I believe.

Manock didn't do Kelvin's autopsy

This was somewhere a bit more alternative than Allans.

Richard and his mates were hanging around the record shops and pinball parlours, which were also frequented by those selling weed. IIFC Adelaide High kids were usually in the know about such things, as were, I would imagine, kids at an 'alternative' school. You didn't need to go to a pub -...

Good find. I think the date of that photo should be 27 July, not 7.

SA case, SA coroner, SA witnesses... It was an SA inquest. Wikipedia is incorrect.

Where did you see that? My understanding was that it was held in SA.