Where did the incident occur? You must have seen a different incident than me. I didn't see anything in the goal sqaure.
Giving them the free kick in the goal square means that the infringment happened in the goal square. It didn't. It happened 5m away from the goal square.
Why then were...
Obviously delibrate. In that split second he was able to grab Bassett in the correct hold to enable him to ram his head into the ground.
What are you thinking? I'm guessing you've watched the tackle in super slow motion where it looks likes there's 5-6 seconds to make the tackle. In reality...
actually it does matter.
in the past (i do not know the current ruling) once the stretcher came onto the ground the game had to stop and the player HAD to leave the ground on the stretcher.
They introduced the rule saying that the player had to get onto the stretcher and taken off the ground...
and they are all part of the game.
I just find it bemusing that at that stage of the game, and scores so tight that the umpire would pull that out.
nowhere have I said it would have changed the result. All i stated that the free kick was paid for something that elsewhere on the ground (ruc...
If the doctor/trainer call the stretcher onto the ground, does the player have to leave the arena on the stretcher?
In years gone by this was always the rule, yet on the weekend a player left the ground by himself even after the stretcher was brought out onto the ground.
Has this rule...
If Westhoff's tap-on with 1.30 to go was a free kick then every ruckman in the competion should be pinged for throwing the ball.
How was Westhoff's tap on different to any ruck tap. He did not carry, cradle or scoop the ball.
Yes, it was open handed, but so is almost every ruck tap.
With...
Port didn't have Westhoff back then, so White was the only suitable back-up forward. Getting rid of him back then would have left Port short of forwrads had Westhoff not comae along as he has.
Sounds like the Bulldogs are putting in play for White.
What a genius!!!!
By your calculations, this means Geelong will take the game by about 20 points.
But what about the fact that Port beat west coast by 3(?) points, collingwood drew with west coast, and then geelong beat collingwood by 5(?) points. Doesn;t this mean the margain will only be 2...
If you've been out of form, what a time to try to get things going... in a prelim, kicking a classic goal, during a 13(?) goal run. Why not celebrate a bit. I didn't even see anything in it.... there are bigger celebrations in any other match.
Watching that 1 seconds clip in slow motion in...
I think we have a good chance of winning, unlike Geelong supporters who are already claiming victory.
If you cannot see that Geelong are the outright favourites, just listen to the tips from neutral supporters, the odds at sports bet...ect. Face it - you are the favourite. Is there something...
Patrick Smith is just out looking for a bit of attention. Another washed up journalist trying to revamp his career by bashing a non-victorian team.
Maybe Patrick is the first grauduate from the 'Robert Walls School of Gutless Trashy Journalism'.
...and if the Power do happen to win, Patrick...
i'd take hodge before bartel any day.
thins is the first season you could class bartel as a star. beofre this season he was hot and cold. a few more goos years under his belt may change opinions.
Surely that would never happen. It restricts the team balance too much. An injury to a running midfielder and they'd be in trouble if they wnet for 3 ruckmen.
With the emegerence of Westhoff for the Power this year, does that make it more likely that Damon White will be traded off this year?
The Crows are one of many teams chasing a key forward and put in a good bid for him last year. They would undoubtedly benfit from someone as White's size and...
when it comes down to it, the past 25 weeks mean nothing once the teams step onto the field.
Geelong are raging hot favourites, and anything but a win will mean this whole season is a failure. All the pressure is on them. Why else do you think the Geelong press concocted all that rubbish about...
The striking case I referred to was the infamous king hit when Baker claimed to be suffering from concussion so couldn't remember what he had done.
I must understand it more than you since I actually agree with the outcome.
i don't know what all the fuss is about. I think the tribuneral finally got something right. Looking at the results of the incident (farmer's face) and it is plainly obvious that...
a) it was high contact
b) it was high impact
c) reckless
I'ts not the first time baker has been involved in a...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.