VelvetSledge
Moderator
- May 24, 2007
- 17,857
- 36,715
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Liverpool FC, Melbourne Storm
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #2
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should've/could've been cut when Baldwin, Tex and Hind were. What's the hold up? Are we still delusional about him being a defender? He's rubbish, delist him.
Probably depends on what Laverde does, given our young beanpoles are almost perpetually injured.They’re gonna keep him as depth
They will not until the next list update. If Laverde goes he will be the depth..............why no delist?
Depth my arse
Is that a mating invitation?.............why no delist?
Depth my arse
Surely delisted today?
We should be doing this. Give Baldwin a SSP shot. Sam should be gone regardless. Take any other player in the late 40s early 50s in his spot.I would have preferred to delist Sam and keep Baldwin as "depth", though I realize Kaine's body is what would have cost him.
He's not signed yet.So Weid has kept his place on the list because of two injured players (fitter than Baldwin, because Z.Reid can’t stay on the park) is how I’m reading this
Weirdeman
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did I miss a re-signing announcement?So Weid has kept his place on the list because of two injured players (fitter than Baldwin, because Z.Reid can’t stay on the park) is how I’m reading this
Weirdeman
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When I saw him playing in his draft year, I think it was an All Australian team at the G, I couldn't believe how good he looked. He appeared to be a star in the making. Clunking marks everywhere and being a real target up forward.Surely delisted today?
No current season stats available