14,583

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

D_One said:
Who won the 5 before that and the first 5?
Click to expand...
Hey Matt, can you record and post your Questions to KT on Youtube.

I doubt you will actually stand by your guns when he gives the PR spiel to your questions.If you even ask them. But know you will bignote yourself and say you did, even suggest you had KT in a quivering mess with your questions.

So yeah, Youtube footage will be good.
 
D_One said:
The 3rd order polynomial trendline is not a prediction ... it is there to identify trends.

PS. Thanks for all those graphs showing the Camry Crows crowds have trended down in the last few years. ;)
Click to expand...
But ia polynomial is cannot identify trends. It models the change in one variable against a 2nd number. In this case it is the 'trend' is crowds vs the numerical value of the year.

I have also shown over the long term, 10 year moving average, there is no 'nosedive'. You also completely ignore this year's upward trend.

After this weekend's crowd we will all see a clearer picture. What is your guess for this weekends Crows game based on your trend analysis.

Clearly you are into share investments, your moving trend analysis and reference to the 'dead cat bounce' give this away. I hope you don't amply these dodgy techniques in your technical analysis. You'll lose all your money.
 
D_One said:
20K hey???

Code: 
2000 Round 8  Venue: W.A.C.A.  Date: 29-Apr-2000  Att: 26,554
West Coast 4-6 8-9 9-15 15-18 108
Wstn Bulldogs 3-7 9-9 11-12 15-12 102
Click to expand...

I stand corrected.

See, unlike you, I can actually admit when I'm wrong.

Perhaps you ought to try it sometime as you might feel better that way

Stewies Power said:
No doubt Lyin's boring football kept a few away.
Click to expand...

Same old Poort, blame everyone but themselves.
 
Stewies Power said:
I don't think you can make that claim until we move into Adelaide Oval and our finances are completely different. With more money = a better chance to prosper. Agree of disagree?
Click to expand...
Only the venue is changing, SANFL is still your owner and have 50% stake in the AO and the SACA has the remaining 50% and were more interested in having their debts paid off than having football.

While it will be new for a while and more central, there is expected to be less parking and who is going to go back to Alberton for after match functions?

If you continue to play uncompetitive football how do you expect to "grow the pie"?

Personally it will be better for me but I am already a dual member. The SANFL will miss out on most of my match day spending.
 
D_One said:
Yes and if Hawthorn win this year's flag then 5% of Essendon supporters will suddenly microwave their memberships and buy a Hawks one next year.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Are you assuming every supporter in SA/Vic have already bought a membership for an AFL club?

Plenty of people I know are first time members in the last 2 years.
 
D_One said:
Is it relevant to look at how your club was going just before the AFL saved it from going around the S-bend?

Code: 
2000 Round 17  Venue: W.A.C.A.  Date: 01-Jul-2000  Att: 10,826
Fremantle 4-5 6-5 9-8 12-10 82
Port Adelaide 1-1 1-8 3-12 8-16 64
Click to expand...

Notice the scoreline of your post? Winning more games has bought in the Freo crowds. Port could take some much needed advice from that
 
Come on D_One, why cant you answer any of the below facts...

Pilchard_Adams said:
1996 finished 12th with an average crowd of 39,428
1997 finished 4th with an average crowd of 40,173 - A rise of 745 per game.
1998 finished 5th with an average crowd of 41,245 - A rise of 1072 per game

2011 finished 14th with an average crowd of 35,020
2012 currently 3rd with an average crowd of 36,825 - A rise of 1805 per game

By the end of the season its quite possible that Adelaides crowds will have improved by more than the improvement shown from 1996-1998 on the back of 2 flags. Why would any Adelaide fan be concerned about this improvement
Click to expand...

Pilchard_Adams said:
Why did west coasts crowds only rise from 35k in 2010 to 37.5k in 2011 when the eagles went from their worst season ever to finishing top 4? After all, in 05, 06 and 07 they averaged over 40k.

Why have Ports crowds dropped from 23.8k in 2008 to 21.2k average in 2012 despite both years having a 30% win average? Thats an 11% drop...

Why did Ports crowds rise from 26.3k average in 2000 to 27.2k average in 2006, yet today Ports crowds are averaged at 21.2k in a year they have similar win/loss percentages?
Click to expand...
 
Marty64 said:
Only the venue is changing, SANFL is still your owner and have 50% stake in the AO and the SACA has the remaining 50% and were more interested in having their debts paid off than having football.

While it will be new for a while and more central, there is expected to be less parking and who is going to go back to Alberton for after match functions?

If you continue to play uncompetitive football how do you expect to "grow the pie"?

Personally it will be better for me but I am already a dual member. The SANFL will miss out on most of my match day spending.
Click to expand...
More members and crowds > after match functions at Alberton, which most likely will still run anyway albeit maybe a few less attendees.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mattrox said:
But ia polynomial is cannot identify trends. It models the change in one variable against a 2nd number. In this case it is the 'trend' is crowds vs the numerical value of the year.
Click to expand...

Yes it can and it is used a lot.

http://jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/rlo/trends.htm
http://biol09.biol.umontreal.ca/PLcourses/Polynomial_regression.pdf

Mattrox said:
I have also shown over the long term, 10 year moving average, there is no 'nosedive'. You also completely ignore this year's upward trend.
Click to expand...

So when will the 10 year moving average identify the downward trend that started in 2008? If you weren't an absolute idiot you would realise that using a ten year moving average smooths the data so much that it actually removes the underlying information. Why don't you apply a 500 year moving average to prove that there has been ni increase in CO2 in the atmosphere in the last century.:rolleyes;

Mattrox said:
After this weekend's crowd we will all see a clearer picture. What is your guess for this weekends Crows game based on your trend analysis.
Click to expand...

Five to eight years ago you would have got 44K. As you are top 4 i wouldn't expect much more than 40K if the weather is good. Anything less will only confirm the downward trend. How much do you think you will get?

Mattrox said:
Clearly you are into share investments, your moving trend analysis and reference to the 'dead cat bounce' give this away. I hope you don't amply these dodgy techniques in your technical analysis. You'll lose all your money.
Click to expand...

Trust me I wouldn't let an imbecile like you anywhere near my portfolio. You really are as thick as pigshit.
 
D_One said:
I did address it. West Coast only play in a 43K stadium. Their crowds are capped. You guys averaging 38K in a 51K stadium is patheitc.
Click to expand...

You average 21k in a 51k stadium

Are you really that thick?
 
Mattrox said:
Here is a graph of the Home Games including finals I have previously posted with a 5 year moving average.
If Showdowns are removed as regular season home games (like D_One's Graph) look at the subtle but noticeable difference it makes to the "drop off" at the end. It accentuates it in the graph, the red line is clearly below the black line that includes the Showdowns during the last 3 years. In the last 3 years the Showdown crowds are quite a bit above average so excluding them drops the whole average for that year.

View attachment 2145

I know you non-numbers people are really bored, but I think someone better be careful before calling others a "lying sack of shit" because infact he has been very sneakily lying this whole time in an attempt to troll.

MERS.jpg
Click to expand...





I never knew Some of the Poort flogs deserve a decent coffin. I assumed they would be stuffed in barrels.
 
D_One said:
Yes it can and it is used a lot.

http://jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/rlo/trends.htm
http://biol09.biol.umontreal.ca/PLcourses/Polynomial_regression.pdf



So when will the 10 year moving average identify the downward trend that started in 2008? If you weren't an absolute idiot you would realise that using a ten year moving average smooths the data so much that it actually removes the underlying information. Why don't you apply a 500 year moving average to prove that there has been ni increase in CO2 in the atmosphere in the last century.:rolleyes;



Five to eight years ago you would have got 44K. As you are top 4 i wouldn't expect much more than 40K if the weather is good. Anything less will only confirm the downward trend. How much do you think you will get?



Trust me I wouldn't let an imbecile like you anywhere near my portfolio. You really are as thick as pigshit.
Click to expand...

There you go with the names again.

A polynomial is used when there is a relationship between 2 numbers. What you are asserting is that the value 1991 gives a certain crowd figures, while 2012 results in a different figure. Using a regression line with the year as a value is nonsense. You must now prepare for your nightly owning.


All the crowd figures and graphs tell us is that the usual home ground average is about 40k with a range from 38 - 43k with one really good year 46k. It shows that in 10 & 11 the crowds dropped, our win loss record shows this to be no surprised. And this year we are on the way back up.


What direction is the Port Power graph trending?
 
Profile of the Sociopath

Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests. ​
​
Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency
Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet "gets by" by conning others.​
 
Sekaj said:
Profile of the Sociopath

Pathological Lying ​
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests. ​
​
Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency ​
Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet "gets by" by conning others.​
Click to expand...


w***er:

A commonly used Australian/british/new zealand word used to describe a ****ball, jerk, arseh*le or jackass.
Another word for tosser, which is usually reffered to when someone is being a tool or a complete dick. The term is usually asscossiated with one who masturbates regularly. Often reffered to as having a wank, hence the term w***er (one who wanks).
 
RonSon said:
Moo:

A commonly used Australian/british/new zealand word used to describe a ****ball, jerk, arseh*le or jackass.
Another word for tosser, which is usually reffered to when someone is being a tool or a complete dick. The term is usually asscossiated with one who masturbates regularly. Often reffered to as having a wank, hence the term Moo (one who wanks).
Click to expand...
You have such a beautiful mind...
 
I've always thought it was acceptable to defend the sociopathic behaviour of mentally ill individuals despite the fact that they represent a clear and present danger to society on the proviso of course that they support the same professional sporting organisation as you do.
 
D_One said:
Wow you're an idiot.:rolleyes:

Code: 
Club   P   W   D   L   For   Agst     %   PP
Port Adelaide 347 175   4 168 32144 32722   98.2 708
Fremantle 391 161   0 230 34447 38066   90.5 644
Click to expand...

I cant see things like 119, 3, 165, 138 in those stats. These embarrassments caused plenty of people to turn their backs. Im sure supporters would have microwaved their memberships if they had a microwave.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

14,583

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top