- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #18
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
This, and calling an 187cm player a 'tall mid' in this day and age is stretching the definition a bit.
Very true but trying to apply that to juniors who aren't absolute standouts is difficult. As for the point as to whether he suits our needs better, well, that's just arbitrary.
I think it's far easier to judge players who definitely don't have that particular point of difference than those that have. There is a whole industry built on the smugness of that fact. On that note, IMO, players who a pretty much bog standard at everything are as useless at AFL level as players who are standout athletes who lack footy nous, if not more so.Agreed, and he went in the same range as Ramsay last year who has pretty similar attributes including his general read around the ground.
That extra second often evaporates when you get to AFL level with more physical pressure and specialist drills to combat player movement through traffic.
Maybe, but at the moment, he's 187cm.He's still 17 years old mate. He's got another cm or two in him I reckon judging by his frame.
Maybe, but at the moment, he's 187cm.
Yeah, in the Colts. He 'slipped' to a pick in the early forties, either other recruiters don't rate his footy IQ as a big enough point of difference or they don't value it enough, lets hope it's the latter.He was an underage stand out in the Colts comp this year mate.
Yeah, in the Colts. He 'slipped' to a pick in the early forties, either other recruiters don't rate his footy IQ as a big enough point of difference or they don't value it enough, lets hope it's the latter.
Still, calling him a 'tall midfielder' in the age of Cripps, who doesn't even play to his height, is more wishful thinking at this stage, even if his marking is a bit better than average.A lazy 6' 2"
What's our current Jack count, 4?
Yes...but also a bit of CrippsReminds me of a more versatile/rounded Williamson
What's our current Jack count, 4?
Imagine if he turns out be Jack Carroll.......Reminds me of a more versatile/rounded Williamson
Really going to be quite the Jack-off each week to secure a spot in the 22Yep 4.
Silvagni, Martin, Newnes, Carroll
Excellent selection by the club.
A lazy 6' 2"
I don't care how tall he is if he's lazy
Imagine if he turns out be Jack Carroll.......