2011/12 A-League Kits

Remove this Banner Ad

Roar announced they will have Puma, but only released a training kit

243180-roar2.jpg

How far down are the logos? Gee, it just looks wrong.

I don't mind the Sydney FC ones but the A League logo looks too big and obvious.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

MV Supporters: We've got a petition to the club going to get long sleeve kits to be sold to the public.

The club wants to see 1000 people interested in them and then they'll set up something to try and get up to that amount of people committing to purchasing them.

If you're interested in a long sleeve MV Adidas kit please join the facebook group below:

http://www.facebook.com/groups/137902736295239/

It would look nice with "KEWELL" on the back of it should everything go well today. ;)

Cheers.
 
I just found this apparently all the HAL Home kits for the coming season, Welly take it hands down. Although long sleeve adidas kits always look sick.
201112halkits.jpg
 
If Brisbane have anything close to the one shown above they will win hands down. For the ones already released, most definitely Wellington.

Nearly all of them are an improvement on the old ones. GCU have probably gone backwards IMO.
 
I don't mind the Seamen kit, much better than what they have had previous.

GCU is just a joke of a club on the field, off the field, and in their brand & kit.
 
ade - hard to make red and yellow work.
MV - love the stripes but for me the V is too big. very busy shirt
BR - like it
syd - nah
MH - suddenly their shirt is brought back to the pack
CGU - teams in the FFV have better shirts than that
CCM - adventurous with the hoop
PG - interesting incomplete vertical lines. perhaps some sort of optical illusion?
barca - not much you can do with red and blue stripes except change the width and number of stripes
 
If the Roar do end up with that kit, they'll definitely have the best kit. Simple and classy.

I like the Victory kit, but would look better with a smaller V, no collar, no side panels, and a sponsor that isn't in a giant red box.

Jets should have kept their gold kit. It's their identity.

Perth kit looks OK. Needs more purple though.

Phoenix kit looks great.

Sydney kit would look great without the collar and the side panels.

Adelaide United's kit looks pretty good. Can't complain

Mariners kit looks awesome, except for the sponsor. Highly doubt it'll be the home kit though.

Gold Coast isn't great, but I was expecting worse. The sponsor is way too big. The logos on the shirt aren't even embroidered.

Overall, fairy happy with the new kits. They are far better than anything Reebok could produce.
 
I like the Victory kit, but would look better with a smaller V, no collar, no side panels, and a sponsor that isn't in a giant red box.

Overall, fairy happy with the new kits. They are far better than anything Reebok could produce.

i like collars so yeah we'll agree to disagree.

the issue i have with the big V is that, well it's too big. having the sponsor sitting around the navel looks silly.

the reebok kits were full of ghey, especially the ones from season 1. yeah let's just bulk print and then throw a single colour on each of them to create new kits
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Have already got Heart's new ISC jerseys and the quality is substantially better than the Reebok pieces of shyte.
 
Still can't believe how bad that GCU kit is (actually, I can).

Like everyone else, I agree that Brisbane and Wellington's kits pwn.

Adelaide's last season after they got Coopers on board was far nicer, which is a shame.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2011/12 A-League Kits

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top