2015 - AFL Round 17

Remove this Banner Ad

GWS 1-39 @ $2.35/Cats 1-39 @ $2.55
Gold Coast +20.5
Freo/Tigers Under 160.5
Melbourne H2H @ $1.95

Might chuck something on North H2H tomorrow if I'm feeling frisky
 
G'day guys haven't posted for years but I have a pretty good value bet for you here and stats to back it up.

Take hawks to score under 17.5 behinds for the match paying 1.72 at William Hill

Hawks have only gone over this total twice this year and that was in round 1 vs Geelong (21 behinds) and round 13 vs Essendon (18 behinds)

Carlton have only allowed a team to score over 17.5 behinds only once this season and that was in round 7 vs GWS (21 behinds)

Hawks last 6 games for this season have had 8,13,11,18,12 & 12 behinds scored

Blues last 6 games have allowed 17,11,10,15,10,15 behinds to be scored against

Whilst their last 6 games vs the blues have seen 10,12,12,18,14,12 behinds scored

Factor in the hawks have been in pretty good and deadly goal kicking form lately and the elements wont play a factor in this game, being played in the dome, this should be a very good value bet in my opinion.

Good luck
Cheers for your great tip Crawfomination , i tailed this with 2u & you were right on the money! WIN
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Backed Lewis for most possies - looked up scores and saw he had 36...

vince-mcmahon-walk.gif


Checked Carlton stats

dr-who-rain.gif
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

if you want a smart-ass answer it depends on the player and the score range.

ie a key forward has a lot more variability in their score and since the totals for those bets are more or less based off the player's average, a middle won't be as valuable as it would be for a midfielder who's scoring is a lot more consistent.
 
if you want a smart-ass answer it depends on the player and the score range.

ie a key forward has a lot more variability in their score and since the totals for those bets are more or less based off the player's average, a middle won't be as valuable as it would be for a midfielder who's scoring is a lot more consistent.

I dont think its worth it. However it is a midfielder. Dan Hannebery i checked his scores and he has only gone inbetween those scores once this year
 
What are peoples thoughts on an 8 point middle for DT is it enough? Odds are both 1.87

Missed the 12 point Armitage middle by 2 seconds and 2 points last week
With odds of $1.87, you are getting effective odds of $13.38 that he hits the middle. This means he has to hit 7.47% of the time to break even. I probably wouldn't take it, but I would take it if odds were $1.90 (i.e. effective odds of $18 and he only has to hit 5.55% of the time to break even).

I have a nice middle of $1.91 and $2.10 for Essendon -14.5 and Geelong +18.5 in the VFL. It would be nice if that comes through.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2015 - AFL Round 17

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top