Bont2Bruce
Ready to rumble
- Mar 15, 2012
- 11,331
- 26,449
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Footscray, Melbourne City
Certainly could.Ok.. Do you think he'll play the first 6 or 7 straight?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Certainly could.Ok.. Do you think he'll play the first 6 or 7 straight?
Surely he's in your team then??Who the **** are CD kidding with Fyfe on 65? Seen him kick it directly to an opponent 3 times, drop a chest mark, shank two shots at goal and give away a couple of dumb free kicks amongst a couple of pretty decent handballs in close and many long kicks to a contest which seem to count as effective disposals even though they don't maintain possession for his team.
Could? Relton Roberts could play 6 or 7 games straight tooCertainly could.
Absolutely, straight in for GAJ who I reckon wont play round 1. Fyfe will average 130+ this season anyway.Surely he's in your team then??
Could? Relton Roberts could play 6 or 7 games straight too
Relton Roberts and Isaac Heeney do not belong in the same conversation.Surely he's in your team then??
Could? Relton Roberts could play 6 or 7 games straight too
somebody please tell me again why Heeney won't play rd 1?
Agree 100%.Sydney have a tough team to break into. I think he could be one of those rookies that are in and out of the team a fair amount, as well as being a sub candidate. Obviously if the Swans get an injury or two he could become a permanent member of the team.
The thing is, that it wouldn't be the end of the world if he played 7 games out of the first 12. A true/false answer to your question isn't really that important.Could?
I perversely want him to be named the sub or omitted round 1 as it will destroy alot of the structures that people have set up with their teams. Looked too good though to not be given a run, don't think he'll be scoring 90s every week though and will play through their forward line mostly.Sydney have a tough team to break into. I think he could be one of those rookies that are in and out of the team a fair amount, as well as being a sub candidate. Obviously if the Swans get an injury or two he could become a permanent member of the team.
A mid-priced player who doesn't consistently play early in the season is very different to a rookie-priced player.Tom Mitchell 2014 says hi.
Because the Sydney selection panel care whether a player is rookie priced or mid-priced when selecting their 22A mid-priced player who doesn't consistently play early in the season is very different to a rookie-priced player.
Don't tell me you started Tom Mitchell in 2014. That was just a trap for rookies set up by CD for the lols.
No, because when you start a mid-priced player in your team you expect them to be in your 22 onfield every week whereas you don't expect all of your rookie-priced players to do so.Because the Sydney selection panel care whether a player is rookie priced or mid-priced when selecting their 22
Agree 100%.
But he could play 6 or 7 straight instead??
So far we have Titch and Heeny playing the first 6-7. Wonder which two of their GF side won't play for the first 7 rounds......
Because the Sydney selection panel care whether a player is rookie priced or mid-priced when selecting their 22
Sydney have a tough team to break into. I think he could be one of those rookies that are in and out of the team a fair amount, as well as being a sub candidate. Obviously if the Swans get an injury or two he could become a permanent member of the team.
Malceski says hi
McVeigh has missed the last 2 games with a calf strain and will be 50-50 for Round 1.
Tippett is also 50-50 for Round 1.
Cunningham and Lloyd played 20 plus games in a row last year - the latter was on the rookie list.
Ditto with Rampe in 2013
Unlike his predecessor, Longmire doesn't mind throwing a rookie in the deep end and perservering with them.
That's a fair point, but Heeney does offer a point of difference in that he can play anywhere on the ground and add clearance work to midfield that is deficient in this area. I think he will play Round 1 and it will be his spot to lose, but he will certainly be vested on occasion (hopefully of the red variety).Cunnigham, LLoyd and Rampe were all > 20 yo, Heeney is still 18. Not saying that he wont play just that it isn't entirely the exact scenario.
You obviously rate him fairly highly, tell me what is his role?... utility? ... position, thanks? He certainly is a talent, just looking at him its hard to work out exactly what type of player he is going to be?That's a fair point, but Heeney does offer a point of difference in that he can play anywhere on the ground and add clearance work to midfield that is deficient in this area. I think he will play Round 1 and it will be his spot to lose, but he will certainly be vested on occasion (hopefully of the red variety).
Agree 100%.
But he could play 6 or 7 straight instead??
So far we have Titch and Heeny playing the first 6-7. Wonder which two of their GF side won't play for the first 7 rounds......
Maybe he is. I still have concerns over whether he'll get a game every week. Skill is not the issue, his body is. Could be wrong, could be right. That's what makes SC a great game.He's better than Lloyd & Bird. Just because they played in a GF doesn't make them better than Heeney. Jack also looks like he has some internal injury.
I agree with Thuggee here.Malceski says hi
McVeigh has missed the last 2 games with a calf strain and will be 50-50 for Round 1.
Tippett is also 50-50 for Round 1.
Cunningham and Lloyd played 20 plus games in a row last year - the latter was on the rookie list.
Ditto with Rampe in 2013
Unlike his predecessor, Longmire doesn't mind throwing a rookie in the deep end and perservering with them.
What issues?Maybe he is. I still have concerns over whether he'll get a game every week. Skill is not the issue, his body is. Could be wrong, could be right. That's what makes SC a great game.