Now the rucks are doing my head in!!
How are the new ruck scoring rules really going to effect ruckmen's scores? If we go by Mumford's 99 in a half of football then that suggests it won't have much of an impact at all.
If NicNat plays NAB3 I'll probably start with him but his injury troubles is a concern. I don't want to be wasting trades on rucks this year.
I'm leaning towards starting with Jacobs & Goldstein, they're the most durable rucks, rarely miss games and should be up the top end of scoring barring injuries. Is it a mistake though to pay $621k for Jacobs? Is he too expensive to warrant a starting selection? That is of course IF the new rules mean that ruckmen are overpriced.
Is there any merit in starting with a cheaper, riskier ruck set-up of NicNat and Zac Smith. If they can both stay fit they should appreciate nicely.
Thoughts?
How are the new ruck scoring rules really going to effect ruckmen's scores? If we go by Mumford's 99 in a half of football then that suggests it won't have much of an impact at all.
If NicNat plays NAB3 I'll probably start with him but his injury troubles is a concern. I don't want to be wasting trades on rucks this year.
I'm leaning towards starting with Jacobs & Goldstein, they're the most durable rucks, rarely miss games and should be up the top end of scoring barring injuries. Is it a mistake though to pay $621k for Jacobs? Is he too expensive to warrant a starting selection? That is of course IF the new rules mean that ruckmen are overpriced.
Is there any merit in starting with a cheaper, riskier ruck set-up of NicNat and Zac Smith. If they can both stay fit they should appreciate nicely.
Thoughts?