2016 AFL - Round 8

Remove this Banner Ad

Anyone think St.Kilda +39.5 is good value?

Eagles average winning margin against interstate opposition since the start of 2015 is 63 points, so I would say the opposite is true.

e: beaten to it.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Dogs are a stupid price - the Dees are building but they're still average.

Complete no-brainer, disappointed if they don't pummel Melbourne.
Dogs at the G are 19-21 SU and 17-23 ATS since 03
Dogs at the G as favs 12-9 SU and 8-13 ATS same period

Since 2013 at the G
2-3 SU 1-4 ATS
As favs
2-2 SU 0-4 ATS
 
The bulldogs back six is depleted now with Adams out.Both teams have fairly well matched midfields IMO.

Gawn could be pretty influential on the outcome IMO.
T.Campbell is an under rated ruck and they have Roughead who wouldnt surprise me to see him go down back if required for Hogan.

Hogan and Garlett are huge concerns the dogs dont have great matchups for them without Johanissen, Bob and Adams.

Hamling is will probably be the man but not a great key defender and little undersized body wise for Hogan IMO. Boyd, Biggs to slow for Garlett.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yeah, Hawthorn seem to score big even during wet games

Thanks mate, probably speak on behalf of the board when I say we appreciate your comments, feedback and detailed posts.

Good luck this weekend.:thumbsu:
 
Agree. Actually think the Dees may run away with this one on the G', Roosy and Goodwin have this team playing brilliant footy. Dogs have played their first 7 games on Etihad, playing on the G' is different. Can play produce? Time will tell

Just an aside the Bulldogs schedule has been a joke, could it be any easier for them?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2016 AFL - Round 8


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top