AFL 2017 - AFL Round 1

[iluvparis]

Pointsbet is amazing. I can't see them being so generous for much longer. Tom Lynch u22 disposals and Armitage u24 disposals - cheers. About four more than what their lines should have been.

I can't see you're aftertiming being this generously recieved for long.

 

[Zealbee]

TAB Touch were basically the only bookie I wasn't limited/banned from promotions with so really appreciate them canning this after 1 round. What did they think was going to happen? Idiots.

 

[mookieb]

TAB Touch were basically the only bookie I wasn't limited/banned from promotions with so really appreciate them canning this after 1 round. What did they think was going to happen? Idiots.

TT promo is back up.

 

[vWestCoast]

TT promo is back up.

Going to absolute smash it this weekend before they take it down

 

[Special Agent Utah]

TAB Touch were basically the only bookie I wasn't limited/banned from promotions with so really appreciate them canning this after 1 round. What did they think was going to happen? Idiots.

They limited me on the weekend and wouldn't let me back Adelaide on the sunday just because i had won a couple of the other games. Interesting to see what they allow this weekend

 

[FallingLiefs]

Cheers. It's more a case of the maximum win should equal the maximum liability. An obvious error by Pointsbet and they will wake up to it soon. If my maximum liability is $150, my maximum win should be $150. The way it is currently, I can win up to $450.

umm i know nothing about sports betting but shouldn't it be mean liability vs mean win. would have thought it would be all about the skew. off just top of my head it would more small wins doing unders and less but bigger wins doing overs if the line is correct. i don't see how it's an obvious error on their behalf. sounds like fool proof money losing method backing overs just on the basis it's uncapped winnings.

 

[Lensen]

umm i know nothing about sports betting but shouldn't it be mean liability vs mean win. would have thought it would be all about the skew. off just top of my head it would more small wins doing unders and less but bigger wins doing overs if the line is correct. i don't see how it's an obvious error on their behalf.

Yeah but you've thought about it for more than eight seconds, let him catch up

 

[X_box_X]

umm i know nothing about sports betting but shouldn't it be mean liability vs mean win. would have thought it would be all about the skew. off just top of my head it would more small wins doing unders and less but bigger wins doing overs if the line is correct. i don't see how it's an obvious error on their behalf. sounds like fool proof money losing method backing overs just on the basis it's uncapped winnings.

I wish you were a bookmaker.

 

[FallingLiefs]

I wish you were a bookmaker.

reading some comments around here also make me wish it too.

 

[Lensen]

I wish you were a bookmaker.

you have thus far identified that some lines are too high for a 50/50 option
you have also thus far identified that betting on overs can have limited losses compared to potential wins

do you think its possible that these two are linked in some way