That's the point..no one does..it's a farce..On GAJ Chrisso said “off ball intentional strikes don’t belong in the game"
So it's ok elbow a player in the head 2 weeks in a row off the ball and intentional but in the 3rd week suddenly it matters.
How can anyone take this corrupt organisation seriously.
The real underlying reason for inconsistency is that MRO is not a tribunal. It operates on the so called view of the "expert" single officer; based on his on his/her own experience, and importantly, not solely dependant on what the evidence alone dictates. The tribunal is different; the members are required to base their finding solely on the evidence as presented; they can't supplement evidence for experience. This is why the appeals have often gone against MRO; and also why similar scenarios appear inconsistently applied from one week to another.On GAJ Chrisso said “off ball intentional strikes don’t belong in the game"
So it's ok elbow a player in the head 2 weeks in a row off the ball and intentional but in the 3rd week suddenly it matters Chrisso.
How can anyone take this corrupt organisation seriously.
Long charge was ‘thrown out’.
No charge on young for staging?
I consider Long's act was dangerous and intentionally done to harm, or done withr reckless indiferrence to whether it caused harm. If it had of been a smaller player like Marc Murphy orZac Fisher it likely would have resulted in either of those players being at the very least tested for concussion and missing 20 minutes of game time, up to actual concussions or injury to the body.
Fair enough mate, I can certainly understand the logic there.
Really ? You need it explained ? Ones a Rioli and the other plays for us ...
Yep, easily explained....Christian is a flog.
Be careful, the AFL gestapo will have you evicted from BF.
Good point....he has a lovely head of hair though
