Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 100,590
- 252,292
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #76
We had met with him.On that, was there ever any actual evidence that we were going for Elliot?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
We had met with him.On that, was there ever any actual evidence that we were going for Elliot?
We low ball everyone.
Yeh, some teams **** it up for us. You get Player A who is average see Player B who is slightly above average get paid a mill, they then think "If he's worth that, I'm at least worth $700k.". We think "We only pay Player C, who is elite, $800k. You can have $600k or go and get ****ed!". Player A then goes to another club who thinks "Holy shit, you want to play for us? Sure, here's $700k!".I hate the implication we lowball people. We offer them a fair wage.
The player salary cap is around $13m and you can't tell me that an AFL team with a primary list of 40 people would have one player realistically worth 1/10th of that amount as a fair amount.
I think the point is that a lot of teams have to over pay.
We have met with him.On that, was there ever any actual evidence that we were going for Elliot?
I hate the implication we lowball people. We offer them a fair wage.
The player salary cap is around $13m and you can't tell me that an AFL team with a primary list of 40 people would have one player realistically worth 1/10th of that amount as a fair amount.
I think the point is that a lot of teams have to over pay.
the teeth gnashing by some supporters over the Hawks not paying some average footballers far more than an avergae wage/contract is amusing.
People seem to forget that the existing players are watching and waiting for their turn of the pie. If you set bad precedents you will pay for it. And don't forget with the ver changing AFL rules of player movement, they are just as likely to announce next week that free agency will be after 6 years from next year. The sma ething happened withteh clubs that rushed to Etihad withthe promises of gold. It takes real management nous to know when to run with the pack and when not to follow the herd.
I am totally okay with theHawks not overpaying/over contracting players that do not deserve it.
Breathe people....it is still some time away from the end of trade period, some 17 days.
The Club are hard at work looking how to improve the list. A lot of gossip from Trade Radio as time to fill with no prospect of news coming out.
Patience.
Especially with Walker almost ready to debutI wanted Eliott but 4 years with his injury history I can see we may've baulked
Elliot makes us instantly better, Walker doesn’t.Especially with Walker almost ready to debut
I'm not just interested in making us instantly better. I'd much rather sustained success which is what I think Wrighty is pushing for. I like most wasn't anti-Elliott but it had to be for the correct terms. A 3 year deal would've been fair but I get the feeling he like others seem to be doing lately is use the HFC to get the deal of close to the deal they want from either the club they're at or another one to give them a ridiculous offer. The other thing to factor in is I want players to 'want' to play for us not to just 'settle' for us. My gut instinct tells me that Elliott really doesn't want to leave.Elliot makes us instantly better, Walker doesn’t.
He's done to Dees. Bookmark itI'm not just interested in making us instantly better. I'd much rather sustained success which is what I think Wrighty is pushing for. I like most wasn't anti-Elliott but it had to be for the correct terms. A 3 year deal would've been fair but I get the feeling he like others seem to be doing lately is use the HFC to get the deal of close to the deal they want from either the club they're at or another one to give them a ridiculous offer. The other thing to factor in is I want players to 'want' to play for us not to just 'settle' for us. My gut instinct tells me that Elliott really doesn't want to leave.
Will this make it easier to get Frost or another player out of the Dees?He's done to Dees. Bookmark it
Heard we”d cooled on him last week. Seems to be wanting to get more years than we’re prepared to offer.He's done to Dees. Bookmark it
He wants 4. Non negotiable.Heard we”d cooled on him last week. Seems to be wanting to get more years than we’re prepared to offer.
Hawthorns keeping its cards close at this stage. Hopefully a potential name comes out in the next few days.
I'd say so. They've just signed 8 blokes, and will also sign Tomlinson on Friday and Langdon is coming.Will this make it easier to get Frost or another player out of the Dees?
He wants 4. Non negotiable.
AgreedIf a player with his injury history (albeit word was that he was through that) at age 27 got a 4-year deal, good on him. Huge risk.
Missing out on Coniglio and Elliot are huge disappointments IMO. Especially when we are now left fighting over the dregs like Butler, CEY, Frost and Greenwood.
Even if we are in a win-now mode I would much rather we take our picks to the draft and play young players, than bring in average players like those mentioned. Obviously the best option is to trade in a gun (if possible) and use our draft picks wisely.
If you follow the EPL then you can equate the remaining potential FA signings to the Wenger/Arsenal banter era signings, overpaid average players that won't be able to shift.
I would rather we heard nothing and then went bang on day one.Heard we”d cooled on him last week. Seems to be wanting to get more years than we’re prepared to offer.
Hawthorns keeping its cards close at this stage. Hopefully a potential name comes out in the next few days.
Agreed.I would rather we heard nothing and then went bang on day one.