S*#!@ the afl site just changed him to 19.
FFS. Was just on the Sportsbet chat too. Ah well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
S*#!@ the afl site just changed him to 19.
Hyeplord faders in full chase made
1.6U - WCE +11.5 @ $1.93 (365)
1.4U - WCE H2H @ 2.57 (top)
The AFL received a call from Sportsbet....S*#!@ the afl site just changed him to 19.
How does that possibly constitute nailing both matches?Dees v Lions -1U
Outstanding week from the hypelord faders - nailed both matches just unlucky the bottom 8 Brions went to water after half time
7-10, +2.171
How does that possibly constitute nailing both matches?
Can't argue with a guy who even when he's wrong he's right
I'll claim my Don's line bet as a W while we're at it cos I could have bailed for a profit half way through the last
Bit hard to argue taking even money+ shots that trade 1.15 in running are poor bets regardless of outcome - that's so some solid results orientated thinking - the kind of results orientated thinking that allows the hypelord faders to make mad bank (although not really - for someone reason the modeLOLers keep backing the Blues EVERY SINGLE WEEK even though they show no ability to win a game).
Thats just lucking out and your bad bet having a good period early. Ie variance. Over the course of the full match Dees were clearly shown up as the better bet.
I'm not still sure how that's nailing the game. Melbourne took control of the contest and asserted their dominance when it was up for grabs, like they have all year over the rest of the competition. If anything, Brisbane showed again the squibs that they are whenever the pressure goes up a notch!I took 2.10 and they started 1.78 or something. They were 1.15 at half time - if you had a vagina you could have locked in bank but I am hero so chose to let it ride. Sometimes we are all hostages to variance.
I'm not still sure how that's nailing the game. Melbourne took control of the contest and asserted their dominance when it was up for grabs, like they have all year over the rest of the competition. If anything, Brisbane showed again the squibs that they are whenever the pressure goes up a notch!
You only need to look at their games this year - They're 2-3 against Top 8 teams, with wins at home against Port (lol) and an undermanned Tigers. Losses to Swans, Cats & Dogs. Are you sure you didn't trick yourself into fading the wrong hypelord here?
Going to be a lot of winners if you put a tick next to your bet any time the price shortens during the match
Thats just lucking out and your bad bet having a good period early. Ie variance. Over the course of the full match Dees were clearly shown up as the better bet.
Popped in here to laugh at ILP as I guessed he went against the Dees yet again, and I am not disappointed.
As I said. They were 2.10. Jumped 1.78 and traded 1.15 in running. An outstanding bet that is long term +ev on any metric
At one point the Saints were $1.50 against us despite opening at above $2. Does that make backing them a good bet?
Absolutely
Isn't that results-based analysis that you normally abhor?
Your narrative seems to change to suit whatever your point is on the day.
The Lions were massively overhyped by the market purely because Neale was in and any smart punter saw the Dees at bounce outside $2 as exceptional value. And guess what? They won the match. You can hang your hat on your "$1.15 at HT" return if you want.
Not sure how taking $1.15 shots at $2 is 'results based analysis'
The results based conclusions is you swanning in a week after the game finished and declaring them value - lel - as I said - enjoy your ban
The specific example I just gave that you confirmed fits your ideology.
Where have I said I bet on the Dees? I haven't aftertimed, I'm having a discussion. The fact that the idea that you could be wrong about anything is unable to enter your head is just bizarre. Wake up to yourself.