List Mgmt. 2021 draft pool.

[Lore]

 

[_RT_]

But why would GWS do that? I can't see it.

Currently they have 2, 5 & 42. We have 12 15 22 31 45 & 49.

Doing the swap gives them more cracks at the draft to restock their list and also allows us to not have to use 6 picks if we don't want to make that many changes.

 

[THE_GUN]

That’s a shocking deal for us. We give up a 2nd and a 3rd in a strong draft for a slight pick upgrade in 2022.

Pies will be bottom 4 in 2022 and Richmond likely top 4
so effectively #4 for Pick #14

giving up picks #33 & #50 or there abouts

Its a sensational deal for us

 

[Mr Magic]

Pies will be bottom 4 in 2022 and Richmond likely top 4
so effectively #4 for Pick #14

giving up picks #33 & #50 or there abouts

Its a sensational deal for us

The Pies will have a better draw next year against weaker teams and are known to influence their draft position. If they are not getting a good pick why would they try to lose?

 

[THE_GUN]

The Pies will have a better draw next year against weaker teams and are known to influence their draft position. If they are not getting a good pick why would they try to lose?

They dont have to try to lose as they are sh!t now and will just worse next year

 

[Mr Magic]

They dont have to try to lose as they are sh!t now and will just worse next year

I know they are shit.

Look at what they have achieved with such shit though.

You don't get great draft picks just from the Collywobblies not winning premierships.

If the Pies are flat track bullies that does not mean you get the best draft picks though

The Pies highlight mediocre crap is not going to get it done, you need the best to win. I reckon they sabotaged their list by sending Treloar to the Bulldogs partly to help stop us winning more premierships

 

[Infamy]

Pies will be bottom 4 in 2022 and Richmond likely top 4
so effectively #4 for Pick #14

giving up picks #33 & #50 or there abouts

Its a sensational deal for us

Far too risky. If we have a bad run with injuries we could be giving away a 2nd & 3rd round pick for a downgrade in the 1st round.

 

[Marcel Proust]

Draft pick order as at the end of Round 7:-

Richmond:- 13, 14, 23, 31, 45, 49.
Collingwood:- 38, 56, 74, 92, 110, 128.

 

[Bird Man]

 

[tigs2010]

View attachment 1118516

Looks excellent for us

 

[Tigers Time]

View attachment 1118516

 

[beema limapep]

View attachment 1118516

Van Rooyen and Bazzo.

 

[THE_GUN]

3 Players i like available at our picks
Jacob Van Rooyen (cats pick)
Rhett Bazzo (Tigers pick)
Ned Long (Saints Pick)

 

[ROYCY HART A TRUE CHF]

3 Players i like available at our picks
Jacob Van Rooyen (cats pick)
Rhett Bazzo (Tigers pick)
Ned Long (Saints Pick)

That's the way I'd be going. Might even fluke Jack Williams !!

 

[Marcel Proust]

3 Players i like available at our picks
Jacob Van Rooyen (cats pick)
Rhett Bazzo (Tigers pick)
Ned Long (Saints Pick)

Josh gibcus sounds handy. Victorian too.

He and balta would hopefully be the back line (KPP) sorted if noah is staying in defence.

I think bazzo has been playing backline and going well.

 

[daird]

Josh gibcus sounds handy. Victorian too.

He and balta would hopefully be the back line sorted if noah is staying in defence.

I think bazzo has been playing backline and going well.

Bazzo played well in defence last year, has actually been swung forward this season and doing okay there too.

 

[Marcel Proust]

Bazzo played well in defence last year, has actually been swung forward this season and doing okay there too.

My bad - wrong way around.

Gibcus.
Williams.
JVR
Bazzo

Interesting options if the club wants bigs

 

[daird]

My bad - wrong way around.

Gibcus.
Williams.
JVR
Bazzo

Interesting options if the club wants bigs

Alex Lukic too, wouldn't be surprised to see us stock up on mostly talls this draft.

 

[THE_GUN]

Im really liking the reports coming about Ned Long

Whilst we are attracted to the KPP due to our impending need to replace Astbury/Riewoldt

But Ned Long looks like he might just become a big inside mid that can play foward

 

[Dr Tigris]

I really wonder if we'll target a KPF, or just take the best available. And if there is a genuine A grade tall take them. Otherwise try to rebuild the midfield for post Cotch etc.

A top line midfield is necessary to win finals. A top line KPF isn't necessary to win the GF, but really helps a lot.

And it's easier to get good mids than good KPs.

Glad I'm not the list manager, I'd be second guessing myself this year.

 

[SumTingWong]

Im really liking the reports coming about Ned Long

Whilst we are attracted to the KPP due to our impending need to replace Astbury/Riewoldt

But Ned Long looks like he might just become a big inside mid that can play foward

We are? How do you know?

 

[Stylo]

Some high quality surnames in that batch

 

[tigs2010]

Some high quality surnames in that batch

We need Goater so we can develop him to replace the GOAT in a few years. Best

 

[Morro]

Many posters expecting us to draft KPP's might be disappointed. Our mantra has been for a very long time, draft Best available and trade/FA for need.

 

[Dr Tigris]

Some high quality surnames in that batch

That's the key, the name. Especially if they are a Jack. Or for us recently have a hyphenated surname. Absolutely should be central in our recruitment.

 

[Tygrys]

The Pies will have a better draw next year against weaker teams and are known to influence their draft position. If they are not getting a good pick why would they try to lose?

Plus they will be getting a new coach. It's very likely they will improve for that reason alone. I'd be very very wary of any deal beyond simply exchanging first rounders.