Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Surely it's okay? I mean 3 of the 4 legs are AFL related.Im all good with sharing cross sport multis. (not sure what the mods think about that ) I dont think there has ever been a restriction on those kind of posts. I like golf, and dont mind multing with a few different sports codes from time to time. Something like a golf tournament carries over 4 days, and its not the worst thing to have something to carry over to the following day.
Yeh I don't mind North to stick with Adelaide most of the game here, Adelaide back from the west too if that's even a thing anymore and off 6 days break.. same as North but Adelaide traveled... Cunnington should inspire North to at least crack in and Mckay back helps with Walker and Fogarty at least.
My only concern is the Roos want that number 1 pick and more than likely finishing last , they have a good selling point to the AFL to get the priority pick.Across 2020 and 2021, North's record was 7-31 (1 draw)
With Cunnington in the team, the record was 6-11 (1 draw)
North without Cunnington in this period went 1-20
The wins were St.K and GWS (2020) and Haw, GC, WC, Carl (2021) and the draw was GWS (2021).
Their finishing positions in the season of the wins / draws in question were, respectively, 6, 10, 14, 16, 9, 13, 7.
No top teams in there but plenty who were traveling better than Adelaide this season.
The point here being that when Cunnington is on the team, even this shithouse North team could beat mid-table teams.
When he wasn't in the team, across 2020-2021, North went 1-20, and that one win was against -- drum roll -- Adelaide (69 points in 2020).
tl;dr As s**t as North were in 2020 and 2021, they were actually a decent enough team with Cunnington in. And atrocious without.
Of course, he hasn't played in a year, is coming back from cancer, and at 31yo is no spring chicken.
But the $6 on offer for North seems overs.
Ben Cunnington AGS $1.85 (365) - 1u
My only concern is the Roos want that number 1 pick and more than likely finishing last , they have a good selling point to the AFL to get the priority pick.
A 5-6 goal loss to Adelaide would be a respectful result given where there are this season. With Horne-Francis also likely to head back home to SA end of this season, Roos may have a strong bargaining chip at this years draft. Possibly 3 of the Top 10 picks?
He's at $2.40 on sportsbet and $2.25 at TAB.
Very fair point and this is the only thing stopping me from loading up on the Kangaroos, Oraz style.
Do you think he spends any time up forward in his first game back? He straight into bulk midfield minutes?
He hit the scoreboard 10/15 games last season
And 3/15 for 2+ last season, including 2.2 in a loss against the Dogs.
He went off early in the VFL last week and is coming off a six-day break.
The $51 for 3+ is mighty tempting...
61 on 365And 3/15 for 2+ last season, including 2.2 in a loss against the Dogs.
He went off early in the VFL last week and is coming off a six-day break.
The $51 for 3+ is mighty tempting...
Free hit with bonus back
Walker ags
Roos +75.5
Cunnington 3+
@ $51.5
If North wins, they effectively lose Pick 1 in the draft. Its a massive price to pay for a meaningless win.But the $6 on offer for North seems overs.
If North wins, they effectively lose Pick 1 in the draft. Its a massive price to pay for a meaningless win.
Not a meaningless win. Cunnington is 'the soul of the club'. Not my words.
Oneil fantasy on PB - jump on, one of the biggest locks of all time.
Xavier Oneil for the eagle, will get heavy midfield minutesWho? Which team?
Im not suggesting he is not, but for North to do it for 4 quarters against the Crows at AO, where they have been fairly competitive all year, is the issue.
Noticed that pointsbet offer money back on first PLACED sgm tonight, which makes sense, then on saturday and sunday they have it as first LOSING sgm. I wondered why I was missing out on bonuses last week. What do they mean first losing sgm? I can put on 5 sgms for a game, what qualifies as the first losing? Makes no sense to me.Free hit
Fogarty 2+
Roos +30.5
Cunnington AGS
Multi @ $11
Not a meaningless win. Cunnington is 'the soul of the club'. Not my words.
first placed means you can place multiple sgms but only the 1st one will be eligible for the offer. So say your first SGM wins and 2nd loses then the 2nd won't be eligible for the offer. While one sat and sunday that 2nd or 3rd etc. sgm which loses will be eligible as it's your first losing sgm of the day. If that makes sense? lolNoticed that pointsbet offer money back on first PLACED sgm tonight, which makes sense, then on saturday and sunday they have it as first LOSING sgm. I wondered why I was missing out on bonuses last week. What do they mean first losing sgm? I can put on 5 sgms for a game, what qualifies as the first losing? Makes no sense to me.