TheGreatBarryB
Hall of Famer
When you made the changes a few months ago many off players dropped 40-50 points and many shit defenders increased by same amount. Didn’t Lamar drop 100 points?I will tweak hybrid anyway, because i think mobile QBs were being slightly disadvantaged in the previous hybrid version.
But essentially, the changes on offense were fixing errors in a few equations and literal typos here and there.
Little things, not fundamental changes to how they score. Especially now that points for "first downs" was reinstated (hybrid) there isn't a deal-breaking difference anymore.
I kinda remember some examples....like say Tom Brady scored 450 before, in hybrid he scored like say 435. Whilst Jared Goff scored say 160 he now scored say 175. And some players like RBs scored say 10 pts more. Many others were affected by say only 1-5 pts. It's all because of typos like fumbles and incorrectly working equations on bonus pts categories.
The drastic difference is that IDPs are more evened out amongst themselves. Which also was geared toward helping the MFL problem when a DT became a DE or a DE became a LB, it made that player useless to own.
Don't look at it as shamelessly bumping up defense and nerfing offense. But like reducing DTs to a more reasonable mark, and then increasing DE/LB/DB to that same rough mark.
DTs were scoring just a bit too much, so top DTs down from say 250 to 230.
DEs and LBs is where the big difference is, pushed up from say 170 before to 220.
CBs and S smaller increase to be around say 190-215 instead of 170-190.
The outcome of hybrid is that the top offensive players still score significantly more than the top IDPs. Like say 300-430. Whilst the top IDPS are around the 180-230 range across the board (dt, de, lb, cb, s).
As you go further down the list of offensive players,, the average and fringe, theres more evenness with the glut of average defensive players.
The top say 75 to 200 scorers is populated more equally across offensive and defensive positions.
But, keep in mind, IDP scoring was overhauled based on statistical re-analysis of the previous five years of NFL, and not just pulling equations out of my ass.
Eg, if the top DTs were getting say 20-30 tackles a year, and the top DEs getting say 40-50 a year, and the top LBs getting say 90-100 tackles, and the top DBs getting say 70-90, then creating new equations for tackles so that purely on tackles theyd all roughly score the same points.
Again wait till the playoffs end, I'll do the scoring changes, so that everyone can actually SEE.
Why are we bothering increasing DBs which is the most random position and awards picked on players? Write down every change you intend to make
I really can’t be arsed to be honest with this obsession of making scores uniform with a more normal distribution. Just increased luck more