Fantasy 2023 BETA - Discussion

What punishment/s should be meted out for 2022s unsportsmanlike play?

  • No punishment, but throw the book at any offenders next time!

    Votes: 6 60.0%
  • Gin drops to 3, Beads punished already by score alteration at the time.

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Both teams drop down 3 spots

    Votes: 3 30.0%
  • Both teams drop to 11/12

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Looking for an RB.

Picks, players whatever available.

PM if you have one that's available :rainbow:
We all are mate! Having to start 2 sucks in the modern day nfl with 90% of teams these days going with a 2 or 3 pronged attack.

2nd fixed RB spot needs to be flexed with RB/WR and TE i reckon.

fuey thoughts??
 

Log in to remove this ad.

We all are mate! Having to start 2 sucks in the modern day nfl with 90% of teams these days going with a 2 or 3 pronged attack.

2nd fixed RB spot needs to be flexed with RB/WR and TE i reckon.

fuey thoughts??

Don't think its a bad idea, tbh...
 
Happy to put that to a vote!

Is it possible to delete the current poll and do another??

Dunno, just get people to say what they want here if you cant

Let anyone with 6 QBs trade before the draft starts to get down to 4 or 5 if we go thru with it.
 
These trades are making me a little antsy...I may struggle to make playoffs if all this works out for you...

I've got pieces that are too hard to replace closer to the end than the start needed to try something haha
 
Happy to drop the QB limit, when you have the opportunity to start 3 it's not great for people to potentially hold onto 6 of the viable ones.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I am not a real fan of dropping the QB limit because if this was in 2 years ago i most likely would of not been able to draft Jordan Love who sat for 2 years on my bench! I can understand people that have 5 starters at QB for this argument but it hurts me because i like to draft them and hope they blossom one day.

I say keep it at 6 or a bare 5 at the minimum and the whole purpose of this format is to draft a dynasty and hope! Lowering the QB limit is just really penalizing teams that have drafted well previously.

Just my 2c and i am not overly strong at QB either but i have rookies or project types i dont want to have to release or drop that i drafted for a purpose only to see someone else nab em for free after i did all the hard work drafting them and sitting on them waiting etc.
 
I am not a real fan of dropping the QB limit because if this was in 2 years ago i most likely would of not been able to draft Jordan Love who sat for 2 years on my bench! I can understand people that have 5 starters at QB for this argument but it hurts me because i like to draft them and hope they blossom one day.

I say keep it at 6 or a bare 5 at the minimum and the whole purpose of this format is to draft a dynasty and hope! Lowering the QB limit is just really penalizing teams that have drafted well previously.

Just my 2c and i am not overly strong at QB either but i have rookies or project types i dont want to have to release or drop that i drafted for a purpose only to see someone else nab em for free after i did all the hard work drafting them and sitting on them waiting etc.

If that's the case then keep two RBs as required starting positions. Unfair on those that "draft well" and have more than 1.
 
If that's the case then keep two RBs as required starting positions. Unfair on those that "draft well" and have more than 1.
Keep em then.

It is the way the nfl is played now league wise regarding the position i brought up. Comparing the QB possy to RB when i just suggested a flex option not a drop of limits is clutching at straws because i dont agree with your opinion.
 
Keep em then.

It is the way the nfl is played now league wise regarding the position i brought up. Comparing the QB possy to RB when i just suggested a flex option not a drop of limits is clutching at straws because i dont agree with your opinion.

32 QBs start every week, we have 3 starting positions dedicated to that. And you think finding two RBs is hard when we have have people stashing up to 6 QBs. Ok.
 
32 QBs start every week, we have 3 starting positions dedicated to that. And you think finding two RBs is hard when we have have people stashing up to 6 QBs. Ok.
Didnt you just trade Rodgers as well for peanuts.

Or was that in another league?
 
Didnt you just trade Rodgers as well for peanuts.

Stafford and Baker for 2.08 and Hunter.

Im not worried about me, have a look at someone like poor old Panda's roster and his QB situation. I genuinely feel bad for him.
 
Stafford and Baker for 2.08 and Hunter.

Im not worried about me, have a look at someone like poor old Panda's roster and his QB situation. I genuinely feel bad for him.
Panda has been in this league for ages and the status of his roster is purely on him.
 
Panda has been in this league for ages and the status of his roster is purely on him.

Surprised you can't find two RBs given how long you've been in the league. What sort of point is that.

Anyway, keep the league as is if change is gonna cause heart burn. I was happy enough to change for the betterment of the league overall not my own self interests. Was just a suggestion.
 
Panda has been in this league for ages and the status of his roster is purely on him.

Don’t drag me into this lol

Not my fault
Mariota Darnold and wentz shit the bed

Good QB that stick around for ages don’t grow on trees


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Surprised you can't find two RBs given how long you've been in the league. What sort of point is that.

Anyway, keep the league as is if change is gonna cause heart burn. I was happy enough to change for the betterment of the league overall not my own self interests. Was just a suggestion.
Only person burning is you mate. I stated an opinion that differed to yours and you throw the toys out of the cot. If it makes you sleep better fuey can you please ignore my RB #2 flex opinion so we can move on. 👍
 
Don’t drag me into this lol

Not my fault
Mariota Darnold and wentz s**t the bed

Good QB that stick around for ages don’t grow on tress


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didnt, ADP did!! 🧐👍
 
OR the alternative is lower the QBs scoring capacity so they are not as dominate and give Wrs and Rbs more scoring power. Also defenders can go up again a bit and this will then prevent high drafting at the position and QB hoarding.

Take away the influence a bit of what one position has and people wont invest so heavily in the 1 roster spot nor will ones roster be hurt due to pure bad luck at the position like Panda copped with a few of his. 😉

Given the leagues stance with tanking though if you are gone by week 10 just start bye players and bench options and secure a decent pick next season as not like anything will happen and half the league virtually voted in favor of it and chose not to penalize so you may as well just do it!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Fantasy 2023 BETA - Discussion

Back
Top