On top of this in the MCC, reserve seating is now all the way to the back row. Will be very close to sold out by game time on Saturday. Could we nudge 85k here?
My initial guestimate last week was 70-80K but I reckon it'll top 80K
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On top of this in the MCC, reserve seating is now all the way to the back row. Will be very close to sold out by game time on Saturday. Could we nudge 85k here?
Hindsight is a wonderful thing but you will also remember that he didnt actually play in round 24.If the AFL was smart they would have fixtured Hawks v Swans for Round 24 last year and Buddy’s last game may have cracked 70/80k as well.
We got that in 2014!If the AFL was smart they would have fixtured Hawks v Swans for Round 24 last year and Buddy’s last game may have cracked 70/80k as well.
I would suggest that St Kilda has the least interstate support of any Victorian team.27,445 at the Gabba tonight. Probably about par. Maybe a touch unders but nothing drastic.
Can we please stop making assertions like this without evidence?I would suggest that St Kilda has the least interstate support of any Victorian team.
There is no way that North, the Dogs and Dees have more support than the Saints in SEQ.Can we please stop making assertions like this without evidence?
Average interstate away crowds for Victorian teams since 2000:
Coll - 35,598
Ess - 32,743
Haw - 32,247
Carl - 31,104
Geel - 30,987
Rich - 30,499
WB - 28,506
StK - 28,384
Melb - 28,018
NM - 27,774
The 4.30 timeslot draws pretty well, families can watch the whole game, people who play sport in the afternoon can make itMCG car park is closed.
There are tickets on Ebay, level for going for $140 each and they have 24 bids on them. Easily going to get over 80k. I know it's a bit later than the tradiotional 2:10pm, but Saturday footy is still king.
The crowd figure was probably more to do with the Lions' form this year.I would suggest that St Kilda has the least interstate support of any Victorian team.
Saints have a good sized support down here in Tassie as well
more to do with the great saints of yesteryear. Baldock and Stewart.Makes sense given they played there for years.
Bit like how Dogs have a bit of support around Cairns and Darwin
Yes - There are good historical reasons for this, given the likes of the great Daryl Baldock, Brownlow medallist Redon Howell and Team of Century member Barry Lawrence, amongst others, who all played for St Kilda. St Kilda was also the first club to play a couple of home games at Launceston until they very stupidly and shortsightedly gave it up (only to later unsuccessfully try Wellington NZ), thus allowing the Hawks to properly embrace and capitalise on this market.Saints have a good sized support down here in Tassie as well
Bendigo is still free for them if they wanted to go there.more to do with the great saints of yesteryear. Baldock and Stewart.
The saints hated playing down here and made the short-sighted move to abandon Launny when they were going great in the mid 00's. That allowed the Hawks to dominate the Tassie market, while the saints haven't been able to find that 2nd market most low-mid sized Victorian clubs have
i cheated. Did a quick edit.Yes - There are good historical reasons for this, given the likes of the great Daryl Baldock, Brownlow medallist Redon Howell and Team of Century member Barry Lawrence, amongst others, who all played for St Kilda. St Kilda was also the first club to play a couple of home games at Launceston until they very stupidly and shortsightedly gave it up (only to later unsuccessfully try Wellington NZ), thus allowing the Hawks to properly embrace and capitalise on this market.
EDIT - You beat me to these points, lol.
No they weren’t, Hawthorn played home games in Launeston two years before St Kilda…Yes - There are good historical reasons for this, given the likes of the great Daryl Baldock, Brownlow medallist Redon Howell and Team of Century member Barry Lawrence, amongst others, who all played for St Kilda. St Kilda was also the first club to play a couple of home games at Launceston until they very stupidly and shortsightedly gave it up (only to later unsuccessfully try Wellington NZ), thus allowing the Hawks to properly embrace and capitalise on this market.
EDIT - You beat me to these points, lol.
No they weren’t, Hawthorn played home games in Launeston two years before St Kilda…
They also were the first club to open up Wellington.
HANZ-UP! for Hawks NZ program
Hawthorn has launched its move into New Zealand and signed its first Kiwi scholarship playerwww.hawthornfc.com.au
In terms of stadium economics, absolutely.OK - I stand corrected. Let’s just say that St Kilda had the opportunity to make Launceston it’s second home and grow their membership - in a place where it already had a lot of local support - and they stupidly stepped away from it. Hawthorn showed much better judgement in sticking with it, reaping the benefits that came.