WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #4
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure ....given so many rounds with teams not playing ....look at top of page byesWill we have best 18 for Opening Round?
They won't want to overcomplicate how the game is played .....I'm not fussing till we hear how they're going to handle thisMy guess remains they will ignore Opening round completely, and then have
1. Rounds 2, 3, 5 and 6 as Best 18 with 2 Trades.
2. Rounds 12, 13, 14 and 15 as Best 18 with 3 Trades.
However this means that a third of the season is going to be Best 18.
Otherwise it will be best 22 for the early byes but with additional trades.
The mid-season bye is always Best 182. Rounds 12, 13, 14 and 15 as Best 18 with 3 Trades.
Just having a look at the early byes, and hypothetically if it was best 22, would probably mean you only take 1-2 max from those teams
Round 2- Walsh and maybe Coleman. Don’t see a heap of other relevant players . Likely no rookies
Round 3- Touk will be cheap, and GC likely to have relevant rookies. GWS might be an avoid
Round 5- Daicos, but think he’s an avoid now. And Grundy probably the only Swan i will take unless Parker gets DPP
Round 6- Gawn and Oliver/Trac. Reckon we can go without Richmond
I think we could get away with best 22 almost, best 18 wouldn’t be bad though
Was pretty keen on Walsh,Touk, Grundy and Gawn before the fixture. Still am. But might limit it to 2-3 of those now
Dawson won't have defender status. But imo it means Young is a lock for D2 or maybe D1 as an underpriced premo, has the "good" bye later in the year too. Same goes for Butters as an underpriced premo and maybe Soldo tooThe net result of their stuffing around is teams will be even more vanilla and dull than last year. They've removed any incentive to start e.g. Daicos over Dawson at D1, everyone will just go Dawson now.
They've made it tough to start great picks like Green, Gawn, Grundy, Walsh, Taranto, Oliver, Miller, Anderson, so teams will just load up on the non-early bye premos like Steele, LDU, Bont, Brayshaw, Laird etc.
Will be much less variation in teams as the pool of viable relevant players has been artificially reduced. Idiots.
Best 18 and 2 trades or best 22 and 3 trades I’d say are front runners, probably the 1stDon’t think anything has been confirmed about the early byes yet but I’m guessing best 18 is how it will work.
I guess the other option is the usual 22 with averages for the guys on a bye.
Is there a Richmond v Melb at some stage?Confirmed match simulations
All games live on Kayo Sports
Wednesday, February 21
North Melbourne v Collingwood, Arden St, 10am AEDT
Thursday, February 22
Sydney v Greater Western Sydney, Tramway Oval, 10am AEDT
Carlton v Geelong, Ikon Park, 11am AEDT
Brisbane v Gold Coast, Brighton Homes Arena, 5pm AEST
Friday, February 23
Western Bulldogs v Hawthorn, Whitten Oval, 11am AEDT
St Kilda v Essendon, RSEA Park, 2pm AEDT
Port Adelaide v Adelaide, Alberton Oval, 5pm ACDT
Saturday, February 24
West Coast v Fremantle, Mineral Resources Park, 4.45pm AWST
I just checked my source for the info ....there's no mistake, no match listed for RICH & MELBIs there a Richmond v Melb at some stage?
And yet, I heard a player mention it as an aside.... looking forward to trying that out against the Dees..... or something like that.I just checked my source for the info ....there's no mistake, no match listed for RICH & MELB
Maybe the source made an error ?
The injury update on Richmond's official website (posted on 17 January) mentioned that we play Melbourne "in four and a half weeks". However, neither club ever posted the details of that match simulation. That's probably why the AFL never specified the match sim on their official website given they wait for clubs to confirm the details first.Is there a Richmond v Melb at some stage?
That's the first "official" PS game ....RICH v MELBAnd yet, I heard a player mention it as an aside.... looking forward to trying that out against the Dees..... or something like that.
Thank you, I knew I read or heard it somewhere, wondering at the time why it's not yet public knowledge.The injury update on Richmond's official website (posted on 17 January) mentioned that we play Melbourne "in four and a half weeks". However, neither club ever posted the details of that match simulation. That's probably why the AFL never specified the match sim on their official website given they wait for clubs to confirm the details first.