Did it become obvious after reading my last post?Obvious ones for me this week.
Bringing in Dempsey (cash gen) and Serong (premo mid - will never leave my side).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Did it become obvious after reading my last post?Obvious ones for me this week.
Bringing in Dempsey (cash gen) and Serong (premo mid - will never leave my side).
After my horrific round 1 score (didn't even reach 1900) I have decided to follow the crowd on this one.Did it become obvious after reading my last post?
Is Serong a must have at this stage of the season? I get he’s just scored a 160 but he’s never shown a ceiling like this before and has already cracked the mil. I’m more focused on the missed value than the fomo early upgrades off the back of one round.Obvious ones for me this week.
Bringing in Dempsey (cash gen) and Serong (premo mid - will never leave my side).
One up and one down seems like the best thing for my team right now. Got pretty much all the other big performing rookies from round 1.
Will leave Budarick in for one week and just hope it was a very bad (one off) game from him. He will be gone next week if he does anything less than 90.
Add Heeney and the Gold Coast boys to that listIs Serong a must have at this stage of the season? I get he’s just scored a 160 but he’s never shown a ceiling like this before and has already cracked the mil. I’m more focused on the missed value than the fomo early upgrades off the back of one round.
Feel like the ships sailed on him and Green for a little while
GTFO...Fish is on a short leash. Will happily punt him if he drops another 60.
Funny you say never shown a ceiling before. A few years ago (before his break out) he had a massive 143 against North (Who he is also playing against this coming week).Is Serong a must have at this stage of the season? I get he’s just scored a 160 but he’s never shown a ceiling like this before and has already cracked the mil. I’m more focused on the missed value than the fomo early upgrades off the back of one round.
Feel like the ships sailed on him and Green for a little while
What do you think Serong does to North this weekend?Is Serong a must have at this stage of the season? I get he’s just scored a 160 but he’s never shown a ceiling like this before and has already cracked the mil. I’m more focused on the missed value than the fomo early upgrades off the back of one round.
Feel like the ships sailed on him and Green for a little while
Is Serong a must have at this stage of the season? I get he’s just scored a 160 but he’s never shown a ceiling like this before and has already cracked the mil. I’m more focused on the missed value than the fomo early upgrades off the back of one round.
Feel like the ships sailed on him and Green for a little while
Get rid of the mid pricers that didn't fire. Which in your case is Wines and Grundy (or Fisher). I am holding Fisher one more week to see if he does better against Fremantle (half backers do very well against them in previous seasons).View attachment 1931690
Any suggestions here?
I think I know what I want to do but want some other ideas.
THat's exactly where I'm sitting currently with Billings and Xerri the ins. Fisher I'm holding at least one more maybe 2 for when Flanders is back from the bye.Get rid of the mid pricers that didn't fire. Which in your case is Wines and Grundy (or Fisher). I am holding Fisher one more week to see if he does better against Fremantle (half backers do very well against them in previous seasons).
Yeah but what are the odds of that actually happening? It’s happened quite often in the past. Happened with Oliver just last year. Started like a house on fire.. everyone scrambled to get him in and he regressed back to the pack (got injured too but no one can plan for that).Funny you say never shown a ceiling before. A few years ago (before his break out) he had a massive 143 against North (Who he is also playing against this coming week).
I think if you are a little slim in the midfield like me it is vital to get the top performing mids in early (or at least one of them) as it is very likely that Serong ends up averaging 120+ this season and being a top 1 or 2 mid. If you don't get him this week and he gets another 150+ score he will be 1.1 mil and out of reach for pretty much the rest of the season
Oliver played the first 10 games last season and didn't drop below 100 for any of them. Was well out of reach at round 3 or 4 when he was still averaging 125+ and got super duper expensive and never really fell in price. He came back very late and scored a 66 in round 23 (his only game below 100 last season). If not for that 66 he would've averaged 120 and been the highest averaging player last season. It was the right call to get him in early (if not for the injury).Yeah but what are the odds of that actually happening? It’s happened quite often in the past. Happened with Oliver just last year. Started like a house on fire.. everyone scrambled to get him in and he regressed back to the pack (got injured too but no one can plan for that).
Not saying he’s not going to be nice to have but I’m just going to take it on the chin and get him when I can without compromising my cash gen. He can’t get much further away from you than he already is
Alternatively, Wines > Serong and Fish > Dempsey, giving Grundy the extra week to perform instead of Fisher....THat's exactly where I'm sitting currently with Billings and Xerri the ins. Fisher I'm holding at least one more maybe 2 for when Flanders is back from the bye.
Of those ones probably the first one. But if you have both Newcombe and Wines I'd be getting both of them out at the same time. One up one down. No point keeping in massive cash players like that for mediocre 60-70 scores.Need some help with the trade options this week please! Leaning towards the second one but outside help is always welcomed .
View attachment 1931708
Thing is its only one week, could do a complete 180 this week. Newcombe has the role were as Wines doesn't.Of those ones probably the first one. But if you have both Newcombe and Wines I'd be getting both of them out at the same time. One up one down. No point keeping in massive cash players like that for mediocre 60-70 scores.
Yeah I think restructuring to a 3 rookie mid setup could be the play with only best 18 scoringIm thinking something similar, but deciding on Newcombe or Wines, don't think ill trade Grundy yet.
Wines > Sharp
Z Reid > D'Ambrosio
155k in bank and switch to 3 mid rookies, keep Coffield on bench to gain abit of cash.
True Newcombe could do a 180. But I've sat on that way of thinking before and almost every time the player still puts out the same putrid scoring and before you know it you've lost over 100k and need to go all the way down to a rook.Thing is its only one week, could do a complete 180 this week. Newcombe has the role were as Wines doesn't.
It's more so are they more important to trade than fixing up rookies like getting Sharp in/Reid out.
I think I'm a bit too weak in the forwards to make this work as nice as owning Serong would be. I'm already fielding Reid & Wilson and would have to field 1 of Dempsey, Campbell or Lazzaro on top of those. If Wines becomes Billings I can field Sharp or Roberts instead of Reid or Wilson match up dependent.Alternatively, Wines > Serong and Fish > Dempsey, giving Grundy the extra week to perform instead of Fisher....
Yeah Reid is basically a leave or go up to Ambrosio imo.True Newcombe could do a 180. But I've sat on that way of thinking before and almost every time the player still puts out the same putrid scoring and before you know it you've lost over 100k and need to go all the way down to a rook.
Reid is interesting because we have literally zero other rookie defenders (unless if they name a 200k one this week). I'd be much more confident in trading Reid if we had a rookie to go to instead of going up to Massimo (who while very good is in a volatile hawks backline where every half backer has one good week and one bad week).
It is best 18 this week and next week...I think I'm a bit too weak in the forwards to make this work as nice as owning Serong would be. I'm already fielding Reid & Wilson and would have to field 1 of Dempsey, Campbell or Lazzaro on top of those. If Wines becomes Billings I can field Sharp or Roberts instead of Reid or Wilson match up dependent.
Wines has to go.View attachment 1931690
Any suggestions here?
I think I know what I want to do but want some other ideas.