Trades 2024 Fantasy Round 5 Trades

[Gunf]

Just going with everyone else, Clohesy/Graham.
Right?View attachment 1956133

My brain actually went WTF for a moment then it clicked kudos good sir/madam

 

[tigs2010]

My brain actually went WTF for a moment then it clicked kudos good sir/madam

 

[Mezzoculo]

Just going with everyone else, Clohesy/Graham.
Right?View attachment 1956133

 

[Phar Ace]

I don't know how to feel that neither of my trade outs are on that list (Salem and Billings)....

Slow?

 

[Mezzoculo]

Slow?

I don't recall asking for feedback.

(Where's your gif, tigs2010 ?)

 

[Phar Ace]

Haven't seen this huge ceiling scores yet .....and for all the hype, the scoring is just ok

That said he's a must in the other format, and he has been a priority pick for me this week

View attachment 1956061

By that pattern, he's due for a sub 100 - 80/90s score this round

 

[Phar Ace]

What would Dimma know

 

[WaynesWorld19]

By that pattern, he's due for a sub 100 - 80/90s score this round

Particularly if Mitchell decides to tag him .....which I doubt

Wouldn't you tag Touk Touk first ?

 

[Phar Ace]

If I could trade mass over Jordan I would tbh. Means clohsey d6 and get a fwd rook off (I got 2 in best 22)
But means no Flanders.

You'd live......

 

[Balsam]

Yeah I guess picking wines over crouch last min stuffed me and an early trade lol

The guy at #1 also started Wines...

 

[Phar Ace]

Or am I two weeks ahead?




No, no I am not.

 

[DangerSloane]

The problem is you can't have a midfield rotation of Laird, Crouch, Dawson and Berry taking most CBA's you need different types to get some.

Soligo getting some mid time last week was a good change now throw Rachele, Rankine and another into the rotations and it will look a lot better and more dynamic.

Spot on.
Individually they're not the problem. The mix is the problem.
Berry shouldn't really be playing. I'm sure another team could use him more than us.

 

[pupstar]

Same boat but I got flanders last week.
Considering one of Miller/Rowell/Anderson. (GCS have a killer draw from here with Eagles/North twice still to come).

But not enough coin to get to Bont without dropping Ambrosio instead of Howes. Points wise its probably the same as Graham will come on for Ambrosio in that scenario... based on current form it's the same output.

But $992k for Bont is still a hefty price tag and only $64k down on his starting price. Would have been better off starting him if that were the case.

Dead right with you saying you should have started with Bont I started with Bont Rozee Merrett and Green Its easier to get them at the start than to try fit them them in later in my opinion regardless of how much they gain or lose. I am ranked in the 200s. So has worked so far this year.

 

[Phar Ace]

Same boat but I got flanders last week.
Considering one of Miller/Rowell/Anderson. (GCS have a killer draw from here with Eagles/North twice still to come).

But not enough coin to get to Bont without dropping Ambrosio instead of Howes. Points wise its probably the same as Graham will come on for Ambrosio in that scenario... based on current form it's the same output.

But $992k for Bont is still a hefty price tag and only $64k down on his starting price. Would have been better off starting him if that were the case.

Young Neale4brownlow waiting for Bonts price to substantially drop:

 

[tigs2010]

I don't recall asking for feedback.

(Where's your gif, tigs2010 ?)

 

[Phar Ace]

Particularly if Mitchell decides to tag him .....which I doubt

Wouldn't you tag Touk Touk first ?

It's a damage-being-done based decision one would think. Those +1's in the backline always look more damaging than they really are - but they get left to their own devices more often than not.

 

[tigs2010]

Calm down Ted

 

[Phar Ace]

Spot on.
Individually they're not the problem. The mix is the problem.
Berry shouldn't really be playing. I'm sure another team could use him more than us.

So you can have too many berries, even when it's only one......

 

[Phar Ace]

Calm down Ted

You miss him too huh?

 

[Neale4brownlow]

Spot on.
Individually they're not the problem. The mix is the problem.
Berry shouldn't really be playing. I'm sure another team could use him more than us.

Berry is a contract year and young.

Crows with a finger in all pies.. do they play the 28+year old proven quantity and go for finals and risk losing Berry? Or play Berry to get him to sign on for longer.

At the moment they're trying to please everyone and it's not working.

 

[Quazza]

Demas and Jordan
For
Stupid sexy Flanders and Clohesy

feels like a win

 

[damunga]

Anyone else bringing in McCluggage

 

[Balsam]

Anyone else bringing in McCluggage


View attachment 1956225

Not now, but he's been high on my watch list all year...

 

[RavensFever]

Can anyone tell me how first overall only has 4 rookies on field already?

Yeah but look at the cash cows on bench pink, cadman, burgess and Thomas yuck

 

[RilesMacca]

Lukosius and Comben are on watch this week for my target at the end of the round. Looking at lukos history he tends to score well in defense and it looked promising last week since he took a big bulk of the kick ins.