Trades 2024 Fantasy Round 7 Trades

[happy_eagle]

I wish they would get rid of the stupid sub rules its ruining my plans but my F6 position looking compromised having the E on Campbell 37 not good enough, Dempsey a sub risk and Gallagher a sub risk and settling on macrae hoping he avoids the vest or else have to swap out to luko to get a respectable score as Caldwell already completed, wanted jordan sweet but with the spread of games need to change of plans of improving team and bench

Williams > Caldwell
Jhye Clarke > macrae

Think I have set my self up right


Gambling on a good score from Garcia (if he's the sub I can swap on Wilson) on field.
Then Wilson (or Lazarro if Wilson is needed at F6) as EMG and if Dempsey is the sub, I can switch Reid into M8 if the EMG score is good enough.

 

[Mezzoculo]

Cadman to H Garcia (will flip to another rook if sub)
Sanders to Macrae (will flip to T Adams if he gets Bevo'd).

 

[Coasters7]

What’s Simpsons JS like?

 

[happy_eagle]

What’s Simpsons JS like?

Gotta be decent if he's wearing Pav's old number.
I reckon if he does enough, he will be in there for a while.

Still a sub risk however.

 

[tigs2010]

1. Dempsey > Sweet field Jordon (loop Wilson and Lazz) will let me go Crae or mid next week
2. Jordon > Crae (loop Wilson and Dempsey) won't be able to do alot next week
3. Clark > Sweet field Jordon (loop Wilson and Dempsey) will be able to get to Crae next week

Help?

 

[damunga]

Anyone else bringing in Matt Kennedy?

 

[DenieD]

1. Dempsey > Sweet field Jordon (loop Wilson and Lazz) will let me go Crae or mid next week
2. Jordon > Crae (loop Wilson and Dempsey) won't be able to do alot next week
3. Clark > Sweet field Jordon (loop Wilson and Dempsey) will be able to get to Crae next week

Help?

I'm probably no help as I suck in fantasy, but we are still very early into the season (round 7 of 24). In my opinion cash gen is still the go to, so number 3: Clark (i'm assuming Jhye?) > Sweet is what you should do.

 

[tigs2010]

I'm probably no help as I suck in fantasy, but we are still very early into the season (round 7 of 24). In my opinion cash gen is still the go to, so number 3: Clark (i'm assuming Jhye?) > Sweet is what you should do.

Yeah Jhye

 

[DenieD]

Yeah Jhye

Also just another thing about Sweet is that Port play the first game on the Thursday next week, so if you don't get him this week you will need to lock in a trade next week before you know all the sunday teams. (Also one of the reasons why I'm going Sweet this week).

 

[tigs2010]

Also just another thing about Sweet is that Port play the first game on the Thursday next week, so if you don't get him this week you will need to lock in a trade next week before you know all the sunday teams. (Also one of the reasons why I'm going Sweet this week).

Thanks for that.

I think I'll do Clark to Sweet and get Jordon or Dempsey to Macrae next week. Think he will be must get by then.

 

[Milo Cyrus]

Anyone else bringing in Matt Kennedy?

View attachment 1971493

on the watchlist.

 

[dplggr47]

Geelong bench: Dempsey, Parfitt, Bowes, Atkins, Duncan.
I think the sub will be between Atkins and Dempsey. Sub will most likely be Dempsey. Unless they cop an injury early, Dempsey will most likely drop in price. Going to Sweet will also lock you out of editing the trade (I think, unless you keep him in utility).

I'm deciding between trading out Dempsey or Sanders. Was originally going to trade out Jhye Clark but with him and Sanders omitted, I'm thinking Dempsey is the one to trade. Then trade Sanders next week. If Dempsey is the sub and Geelong suffer no new injuries, he could be omitted the following week.

 

[SM]

Geelong bench: Dempsey, Parfitt, Bowes, Atkins, Duncan.
I think the sub will be between Atkins and Dempsey. Sub will most likely be Dempsey. Unless they cop an injury early, Dempsey will most likely drop in price. Going to Sweet will also lock you out of editing the trade (I think, unless you keep him in utility).

I'm deciding between trading out Dempsey or Sanders. Was originally going to trade out Jhye Clark but with him and Sanders omitted, I'm thinking Dempsey is the one to trade. Then trade Sanders next week. If Dempsey is the sub and Geelong suffer no new injuries, he could be omitted the following week.

Sub can come from on field, surely Guthrie a chance??

 

[Coasters7]

Also just another thing about Sweet is that Port play the first game on the Thursday next week, so if you don't get him this week you will need to lock in a trade next week before you know all the sunday teams. (Also one of the reasons why I'm going Sweet this week).

Also need to maximise the cash I feel, just in case it goes pear shaped.

Bringing him in this week and worst case you’re still making a bit of him this week and next with a low BE and can offload him again.

Waste of a trade potentially but the rookies this week could be in the same boat. At least we know he has the role if he’s the only ruck picked.

 

[happy_eagle]

Sub can come from on field, surely Guthrie a chance??

With Geelong, the sub could even come from the Emergencies via a late change or two

 

[JDWCE]

I feel like Parfitt is a big chance to be sub with Guthrie back but who knows

 

[dplggr47]

Sub can come from on field, surely Guthrie a chance??

Are you sure? I thought sub had to come from the 5 man bench named?

I feel like Parfitt is a big chance to be sub with Guthrie back but who knows

He's been in decent form though. Bowes has been in great form. Dempsey had a down game last week and is the youngest/inexperienced. Guthrie has a good chance of being subbed off, but I don't think they'll start him as sub.

 

[JDWCE]

Are you sure? I thought sub had to come from the 5 man bench named?

He's been in decent form though. Bowes has been in great form. Dempsey had a down game last week and is the youngest/inexperienced. Guthrie has a good chance of being subbed off, but I don't think they'll start him as sub.

Sub can be named from anywhere on the field or bench.

Parfitt always seems to be on the outer with the Cats which is why I think it’s him. IMO Dempsey wouldn’t make a great sub but whereas Parfitt as sub makes more sense if they want to ease Guthrie in

 

[Aussie_boy]

Keeping D'Ambrosio now and trading Williams to take Howes' 80.

 

[DenieD]

Sub can be named from anywhere on the field or bench.

Parfitt always seems to be on the outer with the Cats which is why I think it’s him. IMO Dempsey wouldn’t make a great sub but whereas Parfitt as sub makes more sense if they want to ease Guthrie in

In my opinion cats have too many inside mids named in their team. I doubt Dempsey would be sub if they have Guthrie, Bruhn, Dangerfield, Parfitt, O'connor, Bowes and Atkins all there.

 

[SM]

Are you sure? I thought sub had to come from the 5 man bench named?

He's been in decent form though. Bowes has been in great form. Dempsey had a down game last week and is the youngest/inexperienced. Guthrie has a good chance of being subbed off, but I don't think they'll start him as sub.

Yep, someone's done it already this season, maybe even the Cats lol.

 

[Shaunn]

Keeping D'Ambrosio now and trading Williams to take Howes' 80.

Wondering if i should trade Williams instead of Massimo and field Graham, obviously Graham might score less but Williams potentially loses cash? i dunno.

 

[Cm Perfect]

Anyone else bringing in Matt Kennedy?

View attachment 1971493

I was $5K off doing it this week, think he's a great option. That was pre Fisher news though so now going Macrae instead.

 

[swanton]

Yep, someone's done it already this season, maybe even the Cats lol.

Nah
It was the other Scott brother
Rd 1 Tsatis from named on wing to sub

If one Scitt brother doesn't get you, then the other one will

 

[Milo Cyrus]

Yep, someone's done it already this season, maybe even the Cats lol.

yep it happens quite often. Bombers have done it with Hind.