MRP / Trib. 2024 - MRO Chook Lotto - Carlton Tribunal News & Reports

[Aphrodite]

 

[lily of laguna]

Well FMD!!!

AFL stoop to new depths of incompetency.

Off to the Tribunal and embarrass that peanut Christian yet again.

Sadly I have no faith that the tribunal will adjudicate this one any better than the Dangerfield case last week.

I feel for Boyd, he got 3 weeks last year for a tackle that was less aggressive than Dangers last week and now has to sit out again for Mansell’s stupidity.

I hope we challenge and the charge gets laughed out but I just don’t trust the system.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[ctwenty1]

We should’ve had Cinc on Christian this week against Richmond. The obvious one we all missed

 

[jackn]

“I’m fired up on this”: Why Carlton’s Boyd should not have been pinged for a free kick, let alone suspended

The Blues defender copped a one-match ban.

www.sen.com.au

When did Kane cornes start making sense? Has he stopped going for shock value or is common sense now shocking, in the commentary lands ruled by the Brian Taylors?

 

[jj1978]

Thought yesterday was July 1st and not April 1st.

 

[SkyhorseTamer]

“I’m fired up on this”: Why Carlton’s Boyd should not have been pinged for a free kick, let alone suspended

The Blues defender copped a one-match ban.

www.sen.com.au

When did Kane cornes start making sense? Has he stopped going for shock value or is common sense now shocking, in the commentary lands ruled by the Brian Taylors?

He's quietly pivoting. He's still shock jock but he's certainly recently made an effort to try to say more balanced things in between

 

[Blue Pulse]

Boyd did everything in his power to avoid taking out Mansell, you can see he runs in and stops on the boundary line and virtually cradle Mansell and then stumbles forward. Mansell got straight up and played out the game, end of story.

There was no malice in what Boyd did and the Richmond players didn't retaliate as per Cripps did with Nank's hit on Harry where he wasn't even looking at the ball.

 

[sbwan]

He hasn't changed, we just agree with his opinion on this occasion.

 

[Jatz]

Think this will be thrown out pretty easily.

 

[Aphrodite]

We're challenging!

 

[skadoosh]

We're challenging!

Unfortunately, for David Zita he will only have the time to munch on three Schnitz chips before Boyd is cleared.

 

[Aphrodite]

 

[Dramoth]

How tf is this medium impact? Michael Christian once again proves his bias and incompetence.

Will get downgraded to low impact and a fine surely.

Will get tossed. No fine. Mansell ducks back into contact to draw a free kick.

 

[Dramoth]

Christian should be fined …

I think you misspelt fired.

 

[Dramoth]

You know it’s a bad decision when Cornes is coming out to bat for a Carlton player.

 

[GoBlues!]

“I’m fired up on this”: Why Carlton’s Boyd should not have been pinged for a free kick, let alone suspended

The Blues defender copped a one-match ban.

www.sen.com.au

When did Kane cornes start making sense? Has he stopped going for shock value or is common sense now shocking, in the commentary lands ruled by the Brian Taylors?

Kane Cornes has matured, while Brian Taylor has regressed to an irrelevant imbecile.

 

[Curnowhan]

Kane Cornes has matured, while Brian Taylor has regressed to an irrelevant imbecile.

No, BT’s always been an irrelevant imbecile

 

[IronMan29]

Already a bit of back peddling by the AFL journos in relation to our appeal of the ban.

Circus.

On SM-G991B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[BlueGum]

Good luck Boydy.

 

[Sam The Doc]

Already a bit of back peddling by the AFL journos in relation to our appeal of the ban.

Circus.

On SM-G991B using BigFooty.com mobile app

what you mean?

 

[Aphrodite]

 

[IronMan29]

what you mean?

The journos are now joining the chorus that it was Mansell that contributed to the high contact and front on nature of the collision because he decided to duck his head and go low instead of continuing the natural momentum of fully extending his torso and taking the bump which would have put him out of bounds.

Boyd provided a duty of care by planting his feet, lifting his arms, and attempted to hault his own momentum to avoid or limit contact to Manuel's head.

Complete contrast to the bullshit we heard from BT, Selwood, and a couple of other nuphys.

Good luck to Boydy tonight, nevertheless.

On SM-G991B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[jackn]

The journos are now joining the chorus that it was Mansell that contributed to the high contact and front on nature of the collision because he decided to duck his head and go low

The journos have been saying that the whole time. There's been nobody besides Brian Taylor and selwood live that have said boyd did the wrong thing. More have said mansell should be suspended than boyd.

 

[Sam The Doc]

The journos are now joining the chorus that it was Mansell that contributed to the high contact and front on nature of the collision because he decided to duck his head and go low instead of continuing the natural momentum of fully extending his torso and taking the bump which would have put him out of bounds.

Boyd provided a duty of care by planting his feet, lifting his arms, and attempted to hault his own momentum to avoid or limit contact to Manuel's head.

Complete contrast to the bullshit we heard from BT, Selwood, and a couple of other nuphys.

Good luck to Boydy tonight, nevertheless.

On SM-G991B using BigFooty.com mobile app

tomorrow night unfortunately (not that we need much time to throw an argument)

 

[gbatman]

The Boyd incident should not even be a free kick.

1. Didn't bump.

2. The player with the ball was coming up, had adequate time to come up, chose to go back down. The player with the ball instigated high contact.

3. Player with the ball was not injured.

 

[Aphrodite]

tomorrow night unfortunately (not that we need much time to throw an argument)

Tonight