Player Watch #32 Samson Ryan

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

He has to play next week v saints … he was again fantastic today
I wouldn't bring him in. Saints are almost as small as Port atm, so I don't think there's a need for two rucks, especially on the fast deck at Marvel.

I'd be more inclined to send Blight into the ruck from down back whenever Keeler goes in and persist with Bauer and Armstrong as the Godfather's henchmen up forward.
 
I wouldn't bring him in. Saints are almost as small as Port atm, so I don't think there's a need for two rucks, especially on the fast deck at Marvel.

I'd be more inclined to send Blight into the ruck from down back whenever Keeler goes in and persist with Bauer and Armstrong as the Godfather's henchmen up forward.
You might be right …. I just like to reward good vfl form which is what he showed today
 
Not sure why people are bagging this guy

If Nank went down tomorrow he is our only option and when he has rucked at VFL level full game he has been very good so its not like we can just pluck a gun Ruck from state football.

He is cheap and is a backup we must have and if he develops in the next 2 years great and if he doesnt then big deal
lets face it , If he was fantastic right now he would have left to play for another team so whats the point bagging the kid
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Not sure why people are bagging this guy

If Nank went down tomorrow he is our only option and when he has rucked at VFL level full game he has been very good so its not like we can just pluck a gun Ruck from state football.

He is cheap and is a backup we must have and if he develops in the next 2 years great and if he doesnt then big deal
lets face it , If he was fantastic right now he would have left to play for another team so whats the point bagging the kid
Makes people feel better to pot players
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch #32 Samson Ryan

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top