Player Watch #34: Jack Graham - MOVED TO WCE - PICK 42 Received

Remove this Banner Ad

We got reamed, as per usual. Time to move on. Pick 42 is unders but still a very handy pick for us to use as trade bait. The list spot opening up is probably worth more than an any pick we would have received anyway.
Part of the problem with the compo picks is Hawks stupid enough to offer Battle 6 years at the reported $900K. Maybe compo should be based on the contract offer made by the club the UFA is playing for. Why should Saints benefit from Hawks stupidity- should be based on value placed on club he plays for -did Saints offer a huge contract?
 
Part of the problem with the compo picks is Hawks stupid enough to offer Battle 6 years at the reported $900K. Maybe compo should be based on the contract offer made by the club the UFA is playing for. Why should Saints benefit from Hawks stupidity- should be based on value placed on club he plays for -did Saints offer a huge contract?
I agree mate, the way that it is set up is incredibly flawed.
 
We got reamed, as per usual. Time to move on. Pick 42 is unders but still a very handy pick for us to use as trade bait. The list spot opening up is probably worth more than an any pick we would have received anyway.
Nothing is going to happen this week, so there's nothing to move on to.:p
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Part of the problem with the compo picks is Hawks stupid enough to offer Battle 6 years at the reported $900K. Maybe compo should be based on the contract offer made by the club the UFA is playing for. Why should Saints benefit from Hawks stupidity- should be based on value placed on club he plays for -did Saints offer a huge contract?
Its well south of $900k. Reason stkilda got so salty is they upped their offer to around $900k to trigger band 1, battle said nah, not going back on my word with the hawks, original contract stands, so Saints were shitting bricks they'd get band 2 which is what they shouldve got!
 
I just did. 'the Bolton deal is 18 +30 for Bolton + 45'. Richmond are bad, he only finished 5th in your B and F and he doesn't want to be there. It's the strongest draft in years, if 18 and change doesn't get it done, go to the draft, the strongest one in years.

You have the same amount of brain cells as you do flags.
 
I just did. 'the Bolton deal is 18 +30 for Bolton + 45'. Richmond are bad, he only finished 5th in your B and F and he doesn't want to be there. It's the strongest draft in years, if 18 and change doesn't get it done, go to the draft, the strongest one in years.
you've already offered 11 & 18
 
Its well south of $900k. Reason stkilda got so salty is they upped their offer to around $900k to trigger band 1, battle said nah, not going back on my word with the hawks, original contract stands, so Saints were shitting bricks they'd get band 2 which is what they shouldve got!
Then the Saints CEO has a big sook and the AFL bent over
 
I just did. 'the Bolton deal is 18 +30 for Bolton + 45'. Richmond are bad, he only finished 5th in your B and F and he doesn't want to be there. It's the strongest draft in years, if 18 and change doesn't get it done, go to the draft, the strongest one in years.
Apologies, and just like before, you have my same answer!

giphy.gif
 
I cant believe the reason Jack Graham decided to leave and select the eagles was because when he read the Jack graham thread on bigfooty and seen the posts .

cant believe players actually read and post here
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

what have you done fridge?
it wasn’t meant to be like this
those leather faced subiaco chardonnay GLUGGERS are going to have their way with you
godspeed
 
Last edited:
I just did. 'the Bolton deal is 18 +30 for Bolton + 45'. Richmond are bad, he only finished 5th in your B and F and he doesn't want to be there. It's the strongest draft in years, if 18 and change doesn't get it done, go to the draft, the strongest one in years.
What kind of ship doesn't dock at Fremantle?
 
I agree mate, the way that it is set up is incredibly flawed.

Are Dunne and O'Rourke going to grow a pair or are they just going to continue to let us be shafted.

Should take the AFL to Court and make all their phony deliberations for all compensation picks ever publicly available through the disclosure process.
 
Part of the problem with the compo picks is Hawks stupid enough to offer Battle 6 years at the reported $900K. Maybe compo should be based on the contract offer made by the club the UFA is playing for. Why should Saints benefit from Hawks stupidity- should be based on value placed on club he plays for -did Saints offer a huge contract?
That was rounded up clearly , why wasn’t ours rounded up , I can’t imagine would have been far off Cummings deal , could be wrong just gut feel
 
I just did. 'the Bolton deal is 18 +30 for Bolton + 45'. Richmond are bad, he only finished 5th in your B and F and he doesn't want to be there. It's the strongest draft in years, if 18 and change doesn't get it done, go to the draft, the strongest one in years.
Hope one of them turns into another Nat Fyfe for you, because by then the real club legend Nat Fyfe retires before he gets to play in a finals team again.
 
I cant believe the reason Jack Graham decided to leave and select the eagles was because when he read the Jack graham thread on bigfooty and seen the posts .

cant believe players actually read and post here
Not just here a lot of posts elsewhere have the same beliefs that he is a plodder.
 
what have you done fridge?
it wasn’t meant to be like this
those leather faced subiaco chardonnay sippers are going to have their way with you
godspeed
*gluggers thank you very much
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0585.jpeg
    IMG_0585.jpeg
    245.4 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_0586.jpeg
    IMG_0586.jpeg
    262.7 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_0588.png
    IMG_0588.png
    626.2 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_0587.png
    IMG_0587.png
    603.2 KB · Views: 5

Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch #34: Jack Graham - MOVED TO WCE - PICK 42 Received

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top