Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Giving him a taste of senior footy and then sending him to the VFL to learn to defend better isn't the same as 'dumping' him, which is akin to delisting. We wanted to develop him. He listened to Hawthorn's overtures and walked.Because we wouldn't play him.
It still doesn't make any sense does it? We won't play a HBF who can't defend but we'll move a Mid who can't defend back there.
We have moved a player back in defense to play unaccountable football.Giving him a taste of senior footy and then sending him to the VFL to learn to defend better isn't the same as 'dumping' him, which is akin to delisting. We wanted to develop him. He listened to Hawthorn's overtures and walked.
Unles that hadn't been the plan until after the end of season review, thinking more carefully about Nick Daicos and watching Kid Coleman tear up a finals series.We have moved a player back in defense to play unaccountable football.
There is 0 reason why Mass could not have been given the same luxury. We chose to not give it to him and happily moved him on.
Dumped is harsh, but if we wanted him he would be our list.Unles that hadn't been the plan until after the end of season review, thinking more carefully about Nick Daicos and watching Kid Coleman tear up a finals series.
Anyway, the conjecture I can see is over whether we 'dumped' Mass or not. I don't think we did.
Unles that hadn't been the plan until after the end of season review, thinking more carefully about Nick Daicos and watching Kid Coleman tear up a finals series.
Anyway, the conjecture I can see is over whether we 'dumped' Mass or not. I don't think we did.
To be fair, if they're trialling Mass in that role then it's worth remembering where he's come from and that it's Rd1 at a new club, and you're comparing him to two of the best in the game. He could impve.We offered him a year, I believe as a rookie. So we didn't dump him but weren't desperate to keep him either.
He was 'fine' for the Hawks on the weekend, but for an unaccountable role that racks up possessions he only had ~ 380 metres gained. For comparison Martin had ~ 529 and Daicos has averaged > 400 for each of his first two seasons. McGrath had 619.
You really need to be cutting the opposition up if you're playing the role.
To be fair, if they're trialling Mass in that role then it's worth remembering where he's come from and that it's Rd1 at a new club, and you're comparing him to two of the best in the game. He could impve.
Solid agree. Wing/attacking half midThe backline experiment sorta sucks. He isn't involved as much, which is a shame.
Happy to eat my words on this at some point in the future though.
Roberts seems more wing than HBFI'd rather leave Hind in Martin's defensive post when Redman comes back, or bring in Roberts
HisCannot defend.
Pls stop playing him there.
We dont defend well enough to roll that dice.His
Role
isnt
To
Defend
If he’s exposed that’s not on him. They’ve chosen to play him there knowing he’s not good at defending