Opine
Norm Smith Medallist
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,352
- 12,278
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Thats one way of looking at it.It was the best outcome the club could squeeze out for an OOC player that wanted out, wasn't completely committed to embrace a role. Hence it wasn't a poor outcome
In response to your post, and to Garters post directly under yours, the same context shows he’s almost a 100 gamer averaging about 20 a year over 5 (he’s durable); played forward, middle, back (he’s versatile); 23 y/o (he’s young and skilful, with scope for improvement under a stable coaching system); appeals to fans (possible marketing value). A pick in the 30s feels fair and reasonable. It was possible.
Agreed his OOC status diminished the club’s bargaining posture. But, barring injury or physical impedement, it didn’t mean a 52 fire-sale was inevitable. Club might have contributed to the narrative which eventually effected the outcome; either positively or by not doing enough to alter perception. Our FM’s opening statement at start of trade period, and the LM’s closing commentary on TR on Friday support that inference.
Clubs and supporters generally advance the best true version of the circumstances in support of their own club’s interests. Feels somewhat different in this instance.
Anyway, ill leave it there as I think I may have reached perceived agenda threshold.
Last edited: