Conspiracy Theory 9-11 Controlled demolition: Scientists confirm active nano-thermite in WTC 9-11 dust.

Remove this Banner Ad

Vaders_1st said:
You don't seriously think some security could defy the United States Governents will?
Click to expand...

What 'will'? The reality of the situation is that to achieve what you believe supposedly occurred you'd have to hide 100 tonnes of nano-thermite in massive buildings that are perennially occupied.

All six James Bonds in their prime couldn't pull off that shit. It's impossible.

And there's the rub for 9/11 truthers and other related conspiracy hicks.

They paint a mythical picture of a US Government that is all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful to the point where magic can be weaved to overcome any obstacle to executing fanciful conspiracies on a level that would make Harrison Potter blush.
 
blatant flaws in the hypothesis proposed by Sergio:

1. Rumsfeld would never have bothered to explain it to Bush.
2. Bush would never have understood it
3. Bush would never have strung together so many moderately well constructed sentences
4. Cheney would have been busy on the phone to his blind trust broker to sell his investments in iraq

i'd be waiting to see what more credible reasons there would be, i suspect there is an innocent explanation such as a vast secret defence complex in the basement where the manage the orbital mind control satellites and when James bond attacked the evil rogue general was forced to activate the self destruct mechanism causing the real explosion and the crashing jets was a cover up to prevent the exposition of the orbital mind control satellites.
 
Never has the US government deliberately sacrificed human beings as a way to engineer propaganda to enter into war.

lusitania3.jpg
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The "controlled demolition" theories in relation to 911 are a crock...a pile of shit!

If you want to see real controlled demolitions just do a google search!

I can't be bothered providing links.

The fact is that controlled demolitions are charecterized by very loud noises (caused by the explosives that need to be placed in exactly the correct positions in relation to the structural makeup of the building and by brilliant white flashes of light.....not by brown puffs of smoke exiting the building as it collapses upon itself.

Oh yeah..."controlled" demolitions don't as far as I know involve very big aircraft smashing into said buildings

Unless you are a nutter who believes in the "hologram" theory:rolleyes:
 
luthor said:
Oooooh...a catchy "Its' an Inside Job" tune accompanied by a series of cartoons depicting Bush and Cheney and Co. looking particularly nasty and malevolent....FFS....populust nonsense!

Read this

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

That says it all.
Click to expand...

that page says nothing at all, just childish teasing, whats your point?

3000 deaths and the loss of the countries civil liberties are a joke?
 
Everything you need to know about the truth of what happened on 9/11 is in the 9/11 Commission Report. That's all you'll need. Just read that and everything about what was one of the biggest disasters in modern history will be revealed.

It's only a matter of time before Osama bin Laden is captured. We know he's either in Afghanistan or Iraq (probably in a cave somewhere helping those evil Iraqis build weapons of mass destruction - Tony Stark ain't the only cave genius you know).

And thank god for those Americans and their allies helping out those poor Iraqis by spreading freedom and democracy. Their lives have undoubtedly been enriched by the Americans visiting their land where they were welcomed with open arms.

Next on the list is Iran. They could use some freedom and democracy too instead of being led by that tyrant Ahmanidejad who must be Saddamed and hung for the sake of the clearly oppresed people of Iran.
 
jmorg1 said:
Everything you need to know about the truth of what happened on 9/11 is in the 9/11 Commission Report. That's all you'll need. Just read that and everything about what was one of the biggest disasters in modern history will be revealed.

It's only a matter of time before Osama bin Laden is captured. We know he's either in Afghanistan or Iraq (probably in a cave somewhere helping those evil Iraqis build weapons of mass destruction - Tony Stark ain't the only cave genius you know).

And thank god for those Americans and their allies helping out those poor Iraqis by spreading freedom and democracy. Their lives have undoubtedly been enriched by the Americans visiting their land where they were welcomed with open arms.

Next on the list is Iran. They could use some freedom and democracy too instead of being led by that tyrant Ahmanidejad who must be Saddamed and hung for the sake of the clearly oppresed people of Iran.
Click to expand...

So what's your explanation for 9/11?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

SergioGeorgini said:
So what's your explanation for 9/11?
Click to expand...

Don't be lazy. Just read the 9/11 Commssion Report yourself. It's fully transparent and explains everything.

George W. Bush said:
You see, the best way to defeat a society that is — doesn't have hope, a society where people become so angry they're willing to become suiciders, is to spread freedom, is to spread democracy.
Click to expand...
 
What baffles me most about the 9/11 conspiracy debate is why people resort to childish calls of "looney, crackpot or whack job" when referring to anyone even slightly skeptical of the official explanation. And it happened to another country, not our own. Yet people still take it personally, as if any calls of foul play are a personal affront against them. The whole tragedy is so weird in its execution and outcome, that you can hardly blame people for asking some serious questions and calling BS on the official report.

Two airplanes hit two buildings, yet 3 buildings in total came down as if by controlled demolition. ABC news presenter Peter Jennings even called it a controlled demolition on the morning of the attack, because that's what it LOOKED like.

The Pentagon gets hit in view of a surveillance camera, and yet we see NO plane in the footage.

Then the Bush Administration used the attack as a launching pad to invade Iraq on the premise of WMD's, which never existed. Of course some people are going to cry "foul"

And "controlled demolition" does not automatically mean "inside job". Bin Laden had highly trained, highly organised, crack pilots on the payroll. They were so good they were able to go about their planning totally undetected, hijack planes using box cutters, and slam them into 3 buildings with frightening precision. Is it such a stretch of logic to assume he also had a highly skilled demolition group (also able to work undetected) involved too?
 
EasternTiger said:
And "controlled demolition" does not automatically mean "inside job". Bin Laden had highly trained, highly organised, crack pilots on the payroll. They were so good they were able to go about their planning totally undetected, hijack planes using box cutters, and slam them into 3 buildings with frightening precision. Is it such a stretch of logic to assume he also had a highly skilled demolition group (also able to work undetected) involved too?
Click to expand...

But that has the same problem as all the conspiracy theories, Why?

If BL had somehow wired up 3 buildings with explosives in secret, why bother flying the planes? In fact flying the planes would only detract from the intent of the attacks if explosives were used.

As it is, people still feel relatively safe - there was a panic about a remote controlled plane or something over NY the other week wasn't there? That was because people are now worried about planes flying into buildings.

Had the buildings just been wired up and then without warning BOOM! It would have a far more terrorising effect. If that happened They would have been saying we can kill you anywhere at any time and you won't see it coming.

People would fear going into any big building because it might be wired to explode and no fighter jets or airport security would help them.
 
Hawkamania! said:
Never has the US government deliberately sacrificed human beings as a way to engineer propaganda to enter into war.

lusitania3.jpg
Click to expand...
You do realise the US didn't enter the war for another two years after the Lusitania was sunk, right?
 
EasternTiger said:
What baffles me most about the 9/11 conspiracy debate is why people resort to childish calls of "looney, crackpot or whack job" when referring to anyone even slightly skeptical of the official explanation.
Click to expand...

Thats because for the most part, they are.
Either that or they are smoking too much drugs.

People who believe these lunatic CT theories are generally simpletons - grasping onto anything to make their own squalid little fantasies seem real.
 
Nick85 said:
But that has the same problem as all the conspiracy theories, Why?

If BL had somehow wired up 3 buildings with explosives in secret, why bother flying the planes? In fact flying the planes would only detract from the intent of the attacks if explosives were used.

As it is, people still feel relatively safe - there was a panic about a remote controlled plane or something over NY the other week wasn't there? That was because people are now worried about planes flying into buildings.

Had the buildings just been wired up and then without warning BOOM! It would have a far more terrorising effect. If that happened They would have been saying we can kill you anywhere at any time and you won't see it coming.

People would fear going into any big building because it might be wired to explode and no fighter jets or airport security would help them.
Click to expand...

Great post. So essentially you're saying the terrorists chose the easier route of hijacking the planes and flying them into the building, rather than the (in your words) much more devastating effect of wiring up and demolishing the buildings.

Although I'm not sure people felt more terrorised by WTC 7 falling without being hit by a plane.

I think the visual of planes flying into the buildings, broadcast for all the world to see and instantly signaling a terrorist attack, following by the horror of seeing people jump to their death, and then seeing the smoldering buildings crumbling to the ground, was much more horrifying.

I mean you don't see people reeling in horror when they are sitting at home watching a casino in Vegas get demolished. I think the way it was done was designed for maximum psychological impact. If it was just wired up and demolished, we wouldn't have had those 2 hours of footage for our brains to accept what was happening, before seeing the buildings collapse.
 
Daytripper said:
Thats because for the most part, they are.
Either that or they are smoking too much drugs.

People who believe these lunatic CT theories are generally simpletons - grasping onto anything to make their own squalid little fantasies seem real.
Click to expand...

same is said about those that swallow everything the MSM spews out.

But hey if the msm don't tell us about the Bilderberg Group, then they don't really exist right?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory 9-11 Controlled demolition: Scientists confirm active nano-thermite in WTC 9-11 dust.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top