Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 3

What's your opinion regarding the 9/11 attacks?

  • The official story makes the most sense

    Votes: 48 40.7%
  • The attacks were allowed to happen

    Votes: 28 23.7%
  • Inside job by US/shadow Government

    Votes: 42 35.6%

  • Total voters
    118

Remove this Banner Ad



Didn't get to the end , kept showing the same crap over and over.
What's the punchline.
Have you got a link between Spielberg and the Towers?
Is "Back to the Future " real? ( I want my hoverboard, and not one of those crap ones with wheels ).
Is it part of a conspiracy, or something supernatural , or real time travel?

You need to do some real homework to make something coherent out of it, otherwise its just some crap someone put on youtube 5 years ago?
( did anyone go and see "the walk ").
 

Log in to remove this ad.

3 sides to the Triangle like Q shows you
+++ Saudi Arabia
++ Rothschilds
+ Soros

Back in 2012 Q started working on flipping Saudi Arabia.
See 2017 events.
Assasination attempt on King Salman & POTUS in Las Vegas
Followed by the arrest of [DOPEY] Prince Bin Talal (involved in 9/11 with Mossad & Bush Admin)
+ 34 other Saudi Princes & 200/300 officials.
Followed by the Sword Ceremony.
POTUS went around to all the big countries with NSA documents showing them he had them all on French Toast.
There was also a group of 13 Families in an underground bunker that got bombed. Truthfully the war was won then.
NK, UK Royals, Vatican was to follow
Operation Defender Europe
Euro Royals, Central Banks, Iran etx
 

Its good to know that people who are vaccinated aren't using one of the dumbest arguments that 911 was an inside job.
They didn't need to melt and the official story didn't claim that they did.

Are you trying to relate the 911 theories to the anti-covid vax thing, because neither does the others credibility any favours.


 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Conspiracy theories are now mainstream. As a consequence they are diluted by stupidity.
Considering that many of the so called "conspiracy theories" lately have been proved correct, they should be mainstream.

This one already has enough evidence to show even though airplanes hit the twin towers, the buildings were brought down by explosives. Can't fault the 3-4 year university engineering analysis of building 7.
 
Considering that many of the so called "conspiracy theories" lately have been proved correct, they should be mainstream.

This one already has enough evidence to show even though airplanes hit the twin towers, the buildings were brought down by explosives. Can't fault the 3-4 year university engineering analysis of building 7.
👍 Spot on
 
Considering that many of the so called "conspiracy theories" lately have been proved correct, they should be mainstream.

This one already has enough evidence to show even though airplanes hit the twin towers, the buildings were brought down by explosives. Can't fault the 3-4 year university engineering analysis of building 7.
I don’t know of any conspiracy theories that have been proven correct?
Please enlighten me.
 
There is a whole thread on here about "conspiracy" theories now found to be true and it's already been discussed that the word "conspiracy theory" was weaponised by the C I A who went to all their media outlets to ask anyone that was questioning the Warren commission findings into the death of JFK, "conspiracy theorists".

In 2008 from around 10 min Corbett discusses how the phrase has been used from JFK and 9/11 to marginalise and prevent looking at evidence to stop thinking critically and accept what you are told to think about the particular subject.

 
In 2008 from around 10 min Corbett discusses how the phrase has been used from JFK and 9/11 to marginalise and prevent looking at evidence to stop thinking critically and accept what you are told to think about the particular subject.
Say what?

“Two things can be learned from our two studies. First, the more people believe in conspiracy theories, the worse they perform on a critical thinking ability test. This test is characterized by an open-ended format highlighting several areas of critical thinking ability in the context of argumentation,” Lantian told PsyPost.

“Second, if we look at the subjective feeling of being a critical thinker (rather than the critical thinking ability evaluated more objectively by the test mentioned earlier) we did not find any evidence for a higher (or lower) subjective critical thinking ability among those who subscribe more to conspiracy theories. This is not in line with the cliché of the conspiracy theorists who see themselves as critical thinkers.”
 
😂 Kurve do you lose your emoji privileges for a year. No ******* chance.

Not yet, nor do I intend to abuse the privilege. But see the wisdom in the mods decision? It's already working out quite well for all, including yourself.
 
Say what?
I provide a link with direct links to the C I A instructions to ask their media assets to promote using "conspiracy theory" to discredit people who were questioning the Warren commission and other links to speeches supporting this and you some random quote from ... checks post ... nowhere but your own head?

Have you have a promotion? You seem to be hanging out here a bit lately?
 
I provide a link with direct links to the C I A instructions to ask their media assets to promote using "conspiracy theory" to discredit people who were questioning the Warren commission and other links to speeches supporting this and you some random quote from ... checks post ... nowhere but your own head?

Have you have a promotion? You seem to be hanging out here a bit lately?
There's no question that organisations can weaponise words (look at the way people weaponise 'woke' or 'social justice warrior'). But that doesn't prove your point in any way. Here's the link to the story, published research, not just an anecdote.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 3

Back
Top