Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 3

What's your opinion regarding the 9/11 attacks?

  • The official story makes the most sense

    Votes: 48 40.7%
  • The attacks were allowed to happen

    Votes: 28 23.7%
  • Inside job by US/shadow Government

    Votes: 42 35.6%

  • Total voters
    118

Remove this Banner Ad

how did you interpret "politics and war" as "everything that ever happens"? :laughing: very closed minded mate

not everyone has the same upbringing, some people don't "wake up" until their 40s or 50s or later, but it's important to always remain open minded and never make those definitive statements like "oh anyone who says X is Y", that's just closing off your own capacity to learn beyond what you currently think

Nope, the statement I was replying to remains stupid.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The Pentagon strike was directed at the auditors investigating it's missing trillions, alone.....The missile killed most of them, the day after Rumsfeld's announcement of their investigation.....Co-incidence?....You be the judge.

It also served to re-enforce a point of difference in it being a direct attack on the U.S defense center, thereby strengthening the case for return aggression in the manner of a war.

WTC7 served as the control-center for the implosion of the Twin Towers - before it too had to be detonated in order to destroy the evidence......It also housed the main offices of the SEC, who were investigating the biggest insider-trading fraud of all the big boys involved in 9/11, in U.S history.

The Shanksville farce merely provided for a Red-Herring & some padding for the 'terrorist narrative' for all to swallow....Too bad the Cleveland Ohio mayor & the Chief fire-fighter at Shanksville - on the day - poured cold water all over that fraud.

I used to believe that what Rumsfield said was pretty nefarious but since it was only a few months into Bush's presidency he would have been criticising the previous Clinton administration. Does that mean Clinton orchestated 9/11 to hide the missing money? No. Turns out what Rumsfield had been pointing to was something less sinister.

Rumsfeld never said the money was missing, only that it could not be tracked. The context makes it clear that he’s talking about antiquated accounting practices. The money is not missing (as in, nobody ran out with a briefcase containing 2.3T), but may be difficult to tell what they spent it on.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 3

Back
Top