Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Of course WTC7 looks a bit strange to both a casual observer and a structural engineer. But if anyone was to look at it from a demolition standpoint, they would also find many oddities.What I find the strangest, is that these jokers can look at videos of WTC 7 collapsing and not think WTF.
Some also know that the building fell at free fall acceleration, but this fact seems to go in one ear and out the other without disturbing a single brain cell.
Amazing stuff! One of them is apparently studying civil engineering too.
These guys have their say on all things demolition related:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC STUDY 8-06 w clarif as of 9-8-06 .pdf (I've posted this one previously so nothing new for those who have been paying attention)
What I find the strangest, is that these jokers can look at videos of WTC 7 collapsing and not think WTF.
What evidence points to this, and what supposed benefit does Al Qaeda get out of it?911 was at an absolute minimum a combination of US covert support and Al Qaeda actioning (at best) I just hope some of you guys can see that side by now ...
How are these two things consistent?The truther arguments have been absolutely embarrassed from what I can see and it suprises me anyone from that side is even turning up anymore ...
911 was at an absolute minimum a combination of US covert support and Al Qaeda actioning (at best) I just hope some of you guys can see that side by now ...
I agree. I was in the midst of a response knowing that H2F has been an advocate for the truther argument in the past and read the opening line as the official argument being embarrassed, and only noticed what he did write when I went to submit it. I did a double take.How are these two things consistent?
More importantly, on what do you base the second para?
I agree but that claim is pretty standard fare for most truther sites.If that is the case, then to suggest that the "official" argument has been completely embarrassed would show an amazing blindness.
I'm beaten. Forget what we see from the actual footage. The evidence is compelling ...
Not surprised. No one likes to be held accountable, or testify under oath, especially politicians. Must be nice to have a job where you can hide your screw ups by saying "Cant explain. National Security"
Ditto reasons for why Rummy went missing in the crisis . Why tricky Dicky was in a bunker calling the shots and why none of them would give evidence underoath at the 911 Commission inquiry.
*******IT was a TOP SECRET strategy!
The questions that need answering is how come Kerosene can melt steel but not burn dry grass.