AE AE13 - Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

It figures... moo/cow.
So Dirty Bird being a big traditional rival of yours must be the Washington Redskins :eek:
Wait, if I use a racist remark on another website, I'm banned here, yet you can use one here? o_O
 
Wait, if I use a racist remark on another website, I'm banned here, yet you can use one here? o_O

Let's not start that debate here.. pleeeease.. GG should know better.. :p

I am in also with a nudge from your regulars. Will pay in a few weeks if that is okay?

largest.jpg


Just give you a heads up RedRifle. I have 80 registered already with 23 still to confirm at this stage, will have their reserved spots waived after 2nd August. I'm after a CAP of 80. We have 57 signed up already. 30 have pledged to TEMPTATION.
100% of Subscriptions go back into the AE Prize Pool. There is $3500 likely to be in the prize pool minimum.

Juggalo Balla is already on the outside looking in at this stage but I'll want to make this perfectly clear.. will PULL back the AE13 DEADLINE to AUGUST 9th now considering most (subs in transit) have indicated they're a day away. From Monday on, you'll get your window of opportunity to jump the light and GET in if there is some openings. I like your chances IF you're ready to speed up the process as there are handful yet to get back to me with determining their choice of payment (paypal or bank deposit) still.

Already have NINE rookies onboard with the word on the AE streets that a tenth is stepping up.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Sorry my mistake

Very BAD bad.. man GG..

P3kRr_zps58b72a36.gif


on the flip side.. I've sent you the Bible so you can adjust yourself to the program. ;)
 
Should we look at doing a footy tips comp or something for all the rookies that can't get in?
Don't worry, im sure someone will give their mate the bank details, accidently forcing it 81, then Woodson will turn around and make it 84 for the rookies who miss out. It happens just about every year doesn't it?
 
on 84, 2 conferences of 6 divisions of 7 teams. Perfect ;)
Why not 96?

2 conferences = 48 in each

24 divisions with 2 in each
16 divisions with 3 in each
12 divisions with 4 in each
8 divisions with 6 in each
6 divisions with 8 in each
4 divisions with 12 in each
3 divisions with 16 in each
2 divisions with 24 in each

Think we have the numbers and interest if Woodson is keen although it is considerably more work
 
Why not 96?

2 conferences = 48 in each

24 divisions with 2 in each
16 divisions with 3 in each
12 divisions with 4 in each
8 divisions with 6 in each
6 divisions with 8 in each
4 divisions with 12 in each
3 divisions with 16 in each
2 divisions with 24 in each

Think we have the numbers and interest if Woodson is keen although it is considerably more work
Probably too big of a leap in one offseason (especially with a greater than normal turnover after the few debacles last years)
Maybe go for 90 and do 3 conferences of 30, with 6 divisions of 5 or something.
 
Probably too big of a leap in one offseason (especially with a greater than normal turnover after the few debacles last years)
Maybe go for 90 and do 3 conferences of 30, with 6 divisions of 5 or something.
So how do we tell Woodson that we decided 90 is the ideal number?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AE AE13 - Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top