Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Back to the nine warning only applies to when you are already in it and need to push back. Ginni was outside running in over the mark by a good two or three metres. Sorry but by the afl instructions that is 50 and was been paid as such as recently as last week in the Melbourne v Brisbane match. Good call.where's the stand and 50 million BACK TO THE NINE
J Daicos having a 'mare
Are these d*clhead commentators still talking about the 50? Just pathetic this VFL mafia sh*t.
(It was a tough call, but move the f*** on)
The commenters complaining about it. He came from well back behind the 9m. Essentially he went over the mark by 8mIt was for encroaching on the 9m you dolts
They could always have just not paid either of those 2 blocks against Blakey, but nah, they'll fix the game by paying a 50 in the back pocket.
The umpires did exactly the same to Pickett in the Melbourne Brisbane final. The players, especially forwards, need to know the 9 metre rule. When they run over like that they are time wasting.Are the commentators morons, it was for running straight over the 9m line
He ran over the mark by three metres!It's funny because it's Ginnivan, but that was an unlucky 50
but he stood where the mark was takenBack to the nine warning only applies to when you are already in it and need to push back. Ginni was outside running in over the mark by a good two or three metres. Sorry but by the afl instructions that is 50 and was been paid as such as recently as last week in the Melbourne v Brisbane match. Good call.
Yes that free to Bianco was complete rubbish ..your mob getting the rub of the green as usualYeah let's not talk about an EXTREMELY poor decision. Let's just let it slide... Smart man.
He knew that wasn't where he needed to standbut he stood where the mark was taken