AFL Dream Team 2006

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
acooldude_au said:
Out: Stanton, Jacobs (for cash for next week to upgrade waters.. If Jacobs makes 100 he still goes down money :()

In: Michael Johnson (for 100k), Rowan Jones (will go up no matter what he scores and I can upgrade him later if need)

What do you think?

dont like it , but thats just my opinion.
 
LukeHodge15 said:
to many to write down, big question marks over wether black will play for a start?

gibson-clarke-harding all getting dropped has shattered my bench players.:mad:

when the bloody hell is hadrill gunna play :confused: :confused:

Hmmm. The Black situation is tough, apparently he is gonna play, but who knows?

I'm with you on the bench players all getting dropped. I really really need those guys to get game time early on so they can increase their values and thus I can subsequently upgrade clowns like Waters.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

acooldude_au said:
Out: Stanton, Jacobs (for cash for next week to upgrade waters.. If Jacobs makes 100 he still goes down money :()

In: Michael Johnson (for 100k), Rowan Jones (will go up no matter what he scores and I can upgrade him later if need)

What do you think?


Don't get Jones just so you can trade him later. That is a big waste of a trade. If you're gonna buy an expensive player buy them for the season. IMO Jones is a bit too risky for my liking to spend 300k+ on him.
 
This week I traded Deledio for Murphy to have 279 000 in the bank.
Therefore next week allowing me to trade Egan for Gilbee, with appox 100k left in the bank to fix anything up.
 
Only problem is ive only got 9k in the bank and that does nothing for me. Stantons price is going to drop like a rock and Jones is a direct swap for him. Everyone below Stanton is :eek:. I dont like those trades either, but Im currently ranked 488 and am doing it for the long run rather than improvement in my team. Ill just do it anyways coz I cant upgrade anyone with 9k.

Is there anyone below Jones that anyone prefers instead of Jones? Thats virtually my only option left.
 
acooldude_au said:
Seems decent... Was McMahon the most you could upgrade to?

can get bateman and below, mcmahon looks the best option i think

another possibility is gram for stiller and damon white for anyone under 335600, so possibly chapman

i am thinking rooke is a bit weaker tho, so am thinking of doing this one
 
dspeed said:
could also hold off a week, do you know how gram needs to go this week to go up in value?

another quick question: motlop or thomas in the 22 this week?

From memory it was around 50ish.. Gram gets a lot of his possessions when the other team kicks a lot of behinds like WC did in Round 1.. I reckon Port are gonna score heaps.. Hopefully Tredrea will be a bit off and Gram gets heaps of cheap marks :)
 
still undecided

simmonds to skipper
lloyd to bruce
and then 79900 left

or

lloyd to skipper
schammer to haselby
and then 87600 left

TRADE 1: Skipper, Bruce, Schammer left in side
(next week, plan to get schammer to haselby - so team would be skipper, bruce, haselby gram)

TRADE 2: Skipper, Haselby, Simmonds left in side
(next week plan to get gram to griffen - so team would be skipper, haselby, simmonds, griffen)

If simmonds gets 100 he goes up 4000
if schammer gets 100 he goes down 1000

NO IDEA WHAT TO DO!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Can any Dee's fan tell me where Chris Johnson is at?

Played round 2.
Didn't round 3 for either the Demons or Sandy.
Not on the injury list? (That I can see)
 
Hey guys just a quick question.
These two trades:

Cassisi to Skipper
then,
S Black to Bruce
Is this worth doing???
Cheers
 
Warney23 said:
Hey guys just a quick question.
These two trades:

Cassisi to Skipper
then,
S Black to Bruce
Is this worth doing???
Cheers

maybe............worth some thought.......black under injury cloud......some i'm inclined to say yes. as long as skipper isnt in ur long term plans
 
I didnt have either aswell. I know have one of them.
 
Whats everyone's obsession with trading Cassisi? He is out of form, yes, but still scoring pretty well. Imagine when he is in form ;)
 
thanks for ur input guys.
nah thinkin of promoting D Motlop off the bench so skipper would be a bench player and to make some cash.
 
sheller891 said:
still undecided

simmonds to skipper
lloyd to bruce
and then 79900 left

or

lloyd to skipper
schammer to haselby
and then 87600 left

TRADE 1: Skipper, Bruce, Schammer left in side
(next week, plan to get schammer to haselby - so team would be skipper, bruce, haselby gram)

TRADE 2: Skipper, Haselby, Simmonds left in side
(next week plan to get gram to griffen - so team would be skipper, haselby, simmonds, griffen)

If simmonds gets 100 he goes up 4000
if schammer gets 100 he goes down 1000

NO IDEA WHAT TO DO!


which option is better - which one is better in the long term
 
Actually just playing around with it i could do the same trade with lovett-murray instead of Cassisi. That would be a better option wouldn't it?
 
Cassius_Clay said:
Whats everyone's obsession with trading Cassisi? He is out of form, yes, but still scoring pretty well. Imagine when he is in form ;)

I dont know why everyone wanted to pick Cassisi before the season started... I know he can get a lot of the ball, but he barely marks or tackles which is why he rarely ever does make 100.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top