AFL Dream Team 2007

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

This is for next week, I only hav 1.6k in my bank and i wanna trade lappin without using up 2 trades. I'm looking to downgrade him to a rookie but which one, im not sure. I'm in a tough position.:eek:
 
This is for next week, I only hav 1.6k in my bank and i wanna trade lappin without using up 2 trades. I'm looking to downgrade him to a rookie but which one, im not sure. I'm in a tough position.:eek:

You looking for someone who is gonna play or just to free up some cash. Jake King is at rookie price (69K) and has been picked to play his second game this week after scoring 60 last week - doubt he will play the whole season though...Hadley is the obvious one but will prob go up to around 110K after this round
 
Extended bench - only one of those 4 will play (hopefully not Cross)



Didn't look very hard eh?

:eek: Hmm see it now, don't know if it wasn't up when I looked or I looked on the right instead of the middle of the page.

Interesting to see a few new guys coming in this week, good to see how they go.
 
Extended bench - only one of those 4 will play (hopefully not Cross)
Yes, I know what an extended bench is mate.

Just curious as to why they would name him seeing as word all week has been that he'll miss for two. I mean I've heard of mind games - but surely this isn't one.

In saying that I hope he doesn't play. I put him on my bench in SC because it had been confirmed he'd miss at least 1 :mad:
Note: Before anyone says that I should have kept him on the field and named an emergency, I also had Lappin so if both were kept on the field and both didn't get up then I'd be a man down. Turns out because of Nigel BLOODY Lappin I will be anyway :(
 
Yeh but the thing is, the player i get will play in my 22:eek:
So if they get dropped later i'm in deeper sh1t.

assuming you have gibbs and hadley???
selwood will miss games every now and then as cats arent as desperate as the blues to have youngsters break collarbones early in their careers so wouldn't be a wise choice as a starter.
probably looking at needing a double trade here sorry and upgrade lappin to a certain starter.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yes, I know what an extended bench is mate.

Just curious as to why they would name him seeing as word all week has been that he'll miss for two. I mean I've heard of mind games - but surely this isn't one.

In saying that I hope he doesn't play. I put him on my bench in SC because it had been confirmed he'd miss at least 1 :mad:
Note: Before anyone says that I should have kept him on the field and named an emergency, I also had Lappin so if both were kept on the field and both didn't get up then I'd be a man down. Turns out because of Nigel BLOODY Lappin I will be anyway :(

Sorry its just there are some drones on here who don't have a clue.
I don't know about mind games I think they're just going to give him right until the bounce to proove his fitness. But i too am confused as to how he could have any chance of even proving fitness if he's said to be out for a couple of weeks. If he was said to only be out for 1 week then maybe a quick recovery was possible but i'm not sure how he could get up from this and play
 
No doubt we'll just to wait until game time too see.

As you said, they're probably just giving him every opportunity to get up.
 
Sorry its just there are some drones on here who don't have a clue.
I don't know about mind games I think they're just going to give him right until the bounce to proove his fitness. But i too am confused as to how he could have any chance of even proving fitness if he's said to be out for a couple of weeks. If he was said to only be out for 1 week then maybe a quick recovery was possible but i'm not sure how he could get up from this and play

Who's said he's out for a couple of weeks? Injury Update said round 7, but then it changed to round 5? I don't think anybody can assume anything until the team sheets are handed in before the game!!
 
With Aker been named [didn't want that at all - due to him keeping his price of around 334k due to only playing two games] what does he need to score to break even? Planned to trade him away this coming week :mad:

Cheers
 
With Aker been named [didn't want that at all - due to him keeping his price of around 334k due to only playing two games] what does he need to score to break even? Planned to trade him away this coming week :mad:

Cheers

mid 130's :eek:
glad i traded him out for j brown this week.
after watching the bullies first few games couldn't see him regularly getting scores higher than 90s. not only that, but didn't like seeing an old man getting hammy problems this early in the year. hope it doesn't bite me in the but in the long run.

edit: too slow haha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top