- Banned
- #26
I agree with the basic premise that the main target for the AFL should be raising the profile of the game internationally. So along with Uluru, Kangaroos,Sydney Harbour etc etc the game is more recognised internationally as the Australian game. Success at that level would inevitably help expansion in NSW and Qld. At this point I still think exhibition matches are the way to go.
Because of the vagaries of english I don't know the implication behind "should"
The AFL is a not-for-profit organisation with a revenue income .
A proportion of the revenue pie should be for :
1.grassroots - to maintain the future pathways.
2.equalisation - to maintain the competition .
3.costs - players ,grounds ,administration etc .
4.development - why ? there isn't one answer and it shouldn't be just to make us feet better .
Investment in the RSA because the money is leveraged by private and government money to provide spectacular results .
A lot of recent exhibition matches have been underwritten by PayTV companies to promote their new AFL product .
Older exhibition matches were underwritten to sell beer .
Other recent exhibition matches like China and LA have been undertaken wrt trade missions .
Investment in NZ and PNG has been undertaken to boost already prominent leagues to provide pathways to the AFL.
Investment in the NT has seen a team introduced into the NEAFL .
In the future we might see a PNG and NZ team there .
Possibly in the distant future we might see a S15 type arrangement .
There are any number of possible investments but unfortunately every venture incurs a cost and that cost has to be justified .