AFL overtaking NRL in QLD

Remove this Banner Ad

Yes and No
Yes because we could still average 28,000-30,000 at Subiaco and Still be profitable.
No because the Paerth Stadium looks nice to host games.

Subiaco was TERRIBLE.
Subiaco had the least viewing where it was needed most - on the wings.
Subiaco had a convoluted layout.
Subiaco had wooden bench seating.
Subiaco had very little in the way of facilities.

The new Perth stadium provides much more in return.
It was designed that way. It was designed to bring in as much income as possible.
Capacity is just one part of it. Corporate facilities are just a part of it.

Apart from the historic aspect, you are the only person who has anything kind to say about Subiaco.
The poor result of Subiaco is from a government who cheaped out severely in the first place
with the rebuild of Subiaco obsolete as soon as it was finished.

Brisbane - do it properly or not at all.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL overtaking NRL in QLD

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top