Fagan "I was worried someone was going to throw a punch"When will chris fagans head be put on the chopping block! He did twice as much as clarko. *sarcasm*
Anyone defending those flogs need to hear the whole story.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Fagan "I was worried someone was going to throw a punch"When will chris fagans head be put on the chopping block! He did twice as much as clarko. *sarcasm*
Anyone defending those flogs need to hear the whole story.
There's definitely something deeper going on here with the Cheshire Cat to be sure.....The moral outrage exhibited is completely out of all proportion with what has transpired.
Might ask you the same thing? Why don't you direct the same inquiry to some of your fellow supporters? It's an interesting topic for discussion - its been illuminating for me that so many people haven't the faintest idea (or regard) about the law, what constitutes self-defence. I've found it interesting that people feel if you're drunken and loud you deserve to be smacked in the head (or worse). Most of all, your good self has reinforced that many on this forum will defend actions purely because that person is a fellow member of their organisation - that mentality is a socially acceptable form of cognitive illness, you know.
I've found it interesting that people feel if you're drunken and loud you deserve to be smacked in the head (or worse).
Right, Right, Right, Right...And your disproportionate outrage on this incident has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that Alistair Clarkson is the Coach of the HFC!...This is after all a football Forum matey.
If you want to be all high n mighty & discuss the topic of violence &proportionality in self-defence etc, etc,... Then there's a social Issues board elsewhere that's more appropriate for such discussions!
Fagan "I was worried someone was going to throw a punch"
I've found it interesting that people see footage of a forceful push off to salvage your own personal space and attempt to twist it into a round house king hit, choker hold and despicable act of violence.
We get you don't like him and have issues with his history. The fact you've let it cloud your ability to assess the incident though does you no favours.
This thread has to do with whether Clarkson's action were justified or not. That's what I'm discussing.
Except only one of us has ever deviated from what happened into suppositions, hypotheticals, melodramas and an infinite world of what ifs.
Mmmmm. Not sure about that. Possibly the Hawthorne way but in general terms punching someone in the mouth is a criminal offence. If you hold a position within a club such as a coach it is important to display a level of professionalism. Striking someone unless you have been struck first won't wash.Not sure how old you are, but it's pretty much common knowledge that if you want a punch in the mouth, walking up to a stranger, harassing them and getting in their face is the right way to go about it.
Would be interesting to see the response if it were someone else involved from another club maybe Leon Cameron or someone lower profiled
If the police decide that there is a case to be answered for, then that will be decided in a court of Law....Not here!
amazing isn't it, they're worried about a punch being thrown & what happened next?Why are fagan and clarkson not allowed to be fearful?
Different circumstance to this and not relevant. The fans agenda was (or should have been) clear to Clarkson (get his attention, get a photograh with him, irritate him). Complete strangers approaching you or I whose agenda would be unclear is a different scenario.
We know who's spinning shit.amazing isn't it, they're worried about a punch being thrown & what happened next?
They've spun so much shit.
amazing isn't it, they're worried about a punch being thrown & what happened next?
They've spun so much shit.
You are (of course) making your own suppositions based on the same incomplete evidence. Not only that but arguing that the action was one necessity which it was not (Clarkson has admitted that it was not - as he said he wished he had continued to walk away).
Most of all, your good self has reinforced that many on this forum will defend actions purely because that person is a fellow member of their organisation - that mentality is a socially acceptable form of cognitive illness, you know.
Yep but clearly football agenda/Port supporters-couldn't have made that much clearer, could they?They weren't fans dressed in colours, they were complete strangers to him and Fagan, stick to the facts
I am very interested in Cheshire Cats thoughts and opinions on the above??I had a very similar incident to Clarkson walking back from the game. Walking up King William street with a female friend, a rather drunk Port fan came up to us and made a few sarcastic comments about the game which we ignored and kept walking. He didn't let up and when he tried to put his arm around me, I elbowed/pushed him hard in the ribs, hard enough that he fell over but his drunken state probably had a bit to do with it. I then received a verbal spray that I can't repeat here but we kept walking trying to put some distance between us. A couple of other Port fans who saw the incident told us not to worry, they would take care of him if he followed us. Luckily he gave up, more for his sake then mine as the gentlemen who came to our rescue were big blokes and I suspect wouldn't have just politely asked him to go on his way (and in case either of our rescuers are reading this - thank you!)
So according to some on this thread, I am the one at fault for a 'violent' reaction. I should have just let this drunken yobo slobber all over me, he was just being 'friendly'. Seriously people, think about what you are saying, you are looking very foolish.
In retrospect - again you err on thisYou are (of course) making your own suppositions based on the same incomplete evidence. Not only that but arguing that the action was one necessity which it was not (Clarkson has admitted that it was not - as he said he wished he had continued to walk away).
Not necessarily. They were walking from pub to pub. They could've followed anyone.Yep but clearly football agenda/Port supporters-couldn't have made that much clearer, could they?
Just supporting his coach. Had a quick discussion after the incident and got there story together.Fagan "I was worried someone was going to throw a punch"
Yep-but they were making comments about the footy weren't they?Not necessarily. They were walking from pub to pub. They could've followed anyone.