It is when people are complaining the club have an unfair advantage
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
AOD-9604 not performance enhancing: Evans
- Thread starter dmc333
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
bad setanta
Club Legend
- Oct 10, 2011
- 2,054
- 1,556
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #52
By the time Evo has finished the bans will go from 6 months to 2 years to 4 years which is what you get for trying to mislead ASADA and WADA, David Evans hahaha what a stain just like his dad.
theduckfan
Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
North Melbourne - 2014 Daw, Black, Gibson Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2013 Daw, Black and Gibson Player Sponsorship
"The question as to whether AOD-9604 enhances performance in this case is completely irrelevant," Ings told AFL.com.au.
In reaction to Evans's statement this arvo.
In reaction to Evans's statement this arvo.
True. But players have already been given the green light on AOD so I guess there aren't any issues at all.
- Sep 3, 2002
- 17,853
- 9,670
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- NBA Winning Machines/Dallas Cowboys
your club doesn't even know who was administered what....
Bomberblitzer
Premiership Player
How does the way in which a drug is administered prove that it is performance enhancing or not?
LanceRomance
Brownlow Medallist
I wonder how many opinions he got before he found the right one
I wonder why that is
iWasSayinBoorent
Senior List
- May 15, 2012
- 246
- 151
- AFL Club
- Essendon
The morons in this thread would draft the WADA code thusly:
Clause 1: If you take something, 2 year ban.
Reason: Why else would you take it if it wasn't to cheat?
The end.
Clause 1: If you take something, 2 year ban.
Reason: Why else would you take it if it wasn't to cheat?
The end.
- Sep 3, 2002
- 17,853
- 9,670
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- NBA Winning Machines/Dallas Cowboys
I wonder why that is
because they are a pack of cheating liars?
One of the countries leading experts in Endochrinology, and a former researcher on the substance. But charters disagrees, thats all that matters
Because that is the defense the club will use not to get reamed for using a substance found on the S0 list.
Sen essendon supporting callers liked because he spoke well apparently
He's not part of ASADA anymore so his comments are irrelevant imo sounds like he has a personal vendetta against ASADA for giving him the flick.
- Sep 3, 2002
- 17,853
- 9,670
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- NBA Winning Machines/Dallas Cowboys
http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...ut-on-asada-investigation/20130704-2peof.html
Evans was also at pains to point out that Watson did not admit to taking AOD-9604, but that he was told the substance was AOD-9604."
http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...ut-on-asada-investigation/20130704-2peof.html
seriously, what a feed of absolute shit. who believes this crap?
Evans was also at pains to point out that Watson did not admit to taking AOD-9604, but that he was told the substance was AOD-9604."
http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...ut-on-asada-investigation/20130704-2peof.html
seriously, what a feed of absolute shit. who believes this crap?
Why lie at the end of the ASADA investigation? Why tell ASADA you took PEDs and then deny it to the public only weeks before the report is revealed?
So you didnt read the age on the weekend?
LanceRomance
Brownlow Medallist
One opinion does not a fact make
So is that based purely on the the amounts used on the players or the amounts done in researching years previously?
- Sep 3, 2002
- 17,853
- 9,670
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- NBA Winning Machines/Dallas Cowboys
I say again, your club claims to not even know what was injected and to who,let alone if it was a PED or not. They don't even know the amount given.
- Apr 24, 2013
- 2,748
- 7,037
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
We can't comment until the investigation is complete.
Except for all the times we do comment.
Except for all the times we do comment.
Yes it does; didn't you read the Shane Charters thread?
Did you? The report from Baker and McKenzie which stated that players were given higher amounts to that given in the research phase by Calzada. Or do we conveniently leave out?
Personally id spread the load over time
Deduct all the points in 2013, Ban players in 2014, dock draft picks in 2015
It has to be harsh. Whats one season of pain when clubs routinely do that just for high draft picks
- Status
