I dont know about now but in the past Assumption College Kilmore was a production line for VFL/AFL players.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
johnson_26 said:if thatw as the case choobhead, then why on the earth did:
1. BCC win the CHISSA/ BSSSA First XV football championship in 2005- in the same competition as st pats
2. Come runner up in the past 2 years MCC Herlad Sun Country Shield
3. Whoop St. Pats' ass in the previous 2005 CHISSA/BSSSA premiership season???
BCC= betetr than ST Pats
johnson_26 said:if thatw as the case choobhead, then why on the earth did:
1. BCC win the CHISSA/ BSSSA First XV football championship in 2005- in the same competition as st pats
2. Come runner up in the past 2 years MCC Herlad Sun Country Shield
3. Whoop St. Pats' ass in the previous 2005 CHISSA/BSSSA premiership season???
BCC= betetr than ST Pats
pete6 said:johnson_26 said:if thatw as the case choobhead, then why on the earth did:
1. BCC win the CHISSA/ BSSSA First XV football championship in 2005- in the same competition as st pats
2. Come runner up in the past 2 years MCC Herlad Sun Country Shield
3. Whoop St. Pats' ass in the previous 2005 CHISSA/BSSSA premiership season???
BCC= betetr than ST Pats
Not once through the year did St Pats play BCC with a full strength side, because St Pats were resting there key players which was really a quarter of the team for the Herald Sun Shield, an also what makes BCC look even worse is they had the chance to show everyone else that they were the best team by playin SPC in the grand final, but if they were to loose there last game of the year they would play a much weaker public school instead of St Pats, so in that semi-final against Ballarat High School BCC got abosoultly smashed cos they played a weaker side, so they wouldnt have to play St Pats in the grandfinal. BCC played Ballarat High School in the grand final an smashed them to bits, so tell me this johnson_26 why did BCC take the easy option an play a much weakened side in the semi instead of playing there full strenght side so they could have a crack at St Patricks
Also just another thing St Pats DID WIN the Herald Sun Shield division one final, who cares if BCC made it to the grandfinal in the division 2. No one ever remembers or cares about a team that looses in a grandfinal.
pete6 said:pete6 said:johnson_26 said:if thatw as the case choobhead, then why on the earth did:
1. BCC win the CHISSA/ BSSSA First XV football championship in 2005- in the same competition as st pats
2. Come runner up in the past 2 years MCC Herlad Sun Country Shield
3. Whoop St. Pats' ass in the previous 2005 CHISSA/BSSSA premiership season???
BCC= betetr than ST Pats
Not once through the year did St Pats play BCC with a full strength side, because St Pats were resting there key players which was really a quarter of the team for the Herald Sun Shield, an also what makes BCC look even worse is they had the chance to show everyone else that they were the best team by playin SPC in the grand final, but if they were to loose there last game of the year they would play a much weaker public school instead of St Pats, so in that semi-final against Ballarat High School BCC got abosoultly smashed cos they played a weaker side, so they wouldnt have to play St Pats in the grandfinal. BCC played Ballarat High School in the grand final an smashed them to bits, so tell me this johnson_26 why did BCC take the easy option an play a much weakened side in the semi instead of playing there full strenght side so they could have a crack at St Patricks
Also just another thing St Pats DID WIN the Herald Sun Shield division one final, who cares if BCC made it to the grandfinal in the division 2. No one ever remembers or cares about a team that looses in a grandfinal.
Gee Pete, you took your losses hard son, despite the fact that BCC played most games throughout the year without many of their key playmakers - Peter Weir and Matt Rice to name just but a few.
Just admit you were not good enough last year. You were beaten fairly and squarely by a better team twice in a year.
Let me add that your school has clearly got a better football record than BCC,and your College's football history is to be admired, but dont go around and denigrate other schools simply becuase you were not good enough to get into the grand final.
Let me also add that BCC would like to play in the Herald Sun Shield, but it seems to be a closed shop. The school plays in the next best Competition which is available to it.
Let me also add that the school is not in the same class as a Sacred Heart College, Essendon Grammar, Assumpstion Colege, Caulfield Grammar or a Xavier etc. Although we have produced Jermey Humm, Adam Fisher, Luke Brennan, James Walker, Adam Campbell, Damiel Batson, in recent years we have not had the long term success of these schools and St Pats. However we are no longer the easy beats of the competition as we were a decade ago.
The important thing is that both schools are now good football schools and have terrific coaches looking after the First XV111 teams. What we should be saying is that these two schools would at full strength be more than compettive with any other school in Australia.
daveyboy3 said:Don't think that actually happened mate
Flying Joey said:pretty sure it did.. i played against them in 2004 and we played their side vs our whole squad of 28.. and we won by 5 goals.. still SHC prob a long way off knocking off some of the previously mentioned VIC schools.. wats WA footy like atm?
brian speaking said:Caulfield Grammar have been pretty good with Judd, Goddard and MacQualter recently, all on scholarships though. Xavier have produced 73 League footballers, St Kevins 165. The reason for St Kevins being the top dog in OZ is that in the 30's and 40's it was the finishing school where all of the Catholics did yrs 11 and 12, hence all of the Paradians, Xavier boys etc left there schools and did matric there.
So St Kevins is technically the greatest.
brian speaking said:Caulfield Grammar have been pretty good with Judd, Goddard and MacQualter recently, all on scholarships though. Xavier have produced 73 League footballers, St Kevins 165. The reason for St Kevins being the top dog in OZ is that in the 30's and 40's it was the finishing school where all of the Catholics did yrs 11 and 12, hence all of the Paradians, Xavier boys etc left there schools and did matric there.
So St Kevins is technically the greatest.
Trav 20 said:Let Haileybury have their brief moment in the sun. Historically, nobody is a patch on Xavier.
when we are talking about the best football team in the country i think we are referring to the past too u know before the last 5-6 years when chelsea sorry i mean hailebury didnt just buy a team full of scholarships in order to win. Historically no-one in australia in any sport compares to assumptions record. Its just the facts and the thing is at assumption the kids pay the school to go there n pay for them not the other way roundfootyfanatic007 said:I believe it is called the Keenan Cup. A cup designed for the best country school boys side to play the best city side at the time (Assumption vs Xavier) some 60 years ago it began, at the moment i believe it is in Assumptions favour by around 4 wins.
And by the way, Sacred Heart College can hoo-haa about their so called dominance over ACK, however in real truth, ACK lost to SHC by 14 points last year, where, Haileybury would spank ACK by around 10 goals.
Haileybury........Daylight........... the rest of the country.
future29 said:when we are talking about the best football team in the country i think we are referring to the past too u know before the last 5-6 years when chelsea sorry i mean hailebury didnt just buy a team full of scholarships in order to win. Historically no-one in australia in any sport compares to assumptions record. Its just the facts and the thing is at assumption the kids pay the school to go there n pay for them not the other way round
footyfanatic007 said:Undoubtably Assumption and Xavier have the best records in Victoria, SHC in South Australia, but there is no dispute that Haileybury currently is the best footballing school. Whether SHC havnt played them or not, id seen both sides play last year, and there is no doubt in my mind HC would give SHC a touch up. Scholarships or no scholarships, Haileybury has smartly developed there school so as to have enough money to buy players. Good on them.
But i am getting sick and tired of other APS schools, namely, Melb Grammer, Scotch, Xavier and Caulfield complaing about their recruiting schemes. They too deal out great amounts in scholarships, but it is blatently obvious that Haileyburys recruiting staff is alot better than that of the other APS schools.
Now on to ACK. ACK will learn very quickly that in order to survive they must get with the times, ACK couldve gone to state glory last year if they just added 3 more quality players to fill up the depth. Someone like Shane Neaves sitting in Whittlesea Secondary is a perfect example of a player that couldve helped ACK to an even better result in 05'. I think this will come about when Ray Carrol leaves, as Assumption is placed perfectly to "poach" as Haileybury does, the extreme amount of talent comming out of the GVFL u/18 comps. Future, i believe ACK will have their weakest side in 5 years next year, and with the record amount of scholarships floating around, they may yet finish lower than 3rd, their lowest ever finish.