I think the other problem is there is other more lucrative T20 tournaments beforehand and in January hence why we get players for 3-4 games
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The broadcasters need to demand less for the betterment of the sport then. Off the top of my head the BBL is the only T20 league that has two teams in 1 city.Once again it comes back to meeting the priorities of broadcasters. 8 teams enables at least one game every night for ~6 weeks. Can't do that with 6 teams flying all over the country--players aren't robots and they need rest days (or so the ACA says). 2 teams each from Melbourne and Sydney also means a greater ratio of games appealing to the 2 major TV markets which are the lifeblood of the league.
And by the way: England's top T20 league has 18 teams, the IPL is returning to 10, South Africa have 8 and the Hundred is also made up of 8.
The one team cities definitely got behind their teams from the first season. Melbourne and Sydney having 1 team each would've had great support but bringing in a second team afterwards would've been tough. Let's face it though, a stand alone Melbourne team at the G was never going to sellout every game, 40-50k average would've been great though. CA wanted to get away from state based teams so having 2 team towns did force player movement that probably wouldn't have happened.The broadcasters need to demand less for the betterment of the sport then. Off the top of my head the BBL is the only T20 league that has two teams in 1 city.
England still run a 18 team league cause they run it based on their county system.
The IPL has the depth though, and they still run the Vijay Hazare Trophy based on their state system as well.
South Africa for the past few season have had 6 teams, this season they are returning to their First Class team for the T20 league which means 8 teams.
If this is meant to compare to the franchise leagues that work well, the PSL went from 5-6 teams, and the CPL has stayed at 6 teams from it's conception.
This is where CA needs to earn their money and negotiate with other nations so they aren't crossing over. Bangladesh can surely be reasoned with.I think the other problem is there is other more lucrative T20 tournaments beforehand and in January hence why we get players for 3-4 games
England's T20 league is no longer their big ticket tournament. That's now The Hundred, which has 8 teams, two of which are in London.The broadcasters need to demand less for the betterment of the sport then. Off the top of my head the BBL is the only T20 league that has two teams in 1 city.
England still run a 18 team league cause they run it based on their county system.
The one team cities definitely got behind their teams from the first season. Melbourne and Sydney having 1 team each would've had great support but bringing in a second team afterwards would've been tough. Let's face it though, a stand alone Melbourne team at the G was never going to sellout every game, 40-50k average would've been great though. CA wanted to get away from state based teams so having 2 team towns did force player movement that probably wouldn't have happened.
This is where CA needs to earn their money and negotiate with other nations so they aren't crossing over. Bangladesh can surely be reasoned with.
All the more reason not to get in each other's way. Then everyone can get maximum international eyeballs.let's promise them a Test series (and then cancel/postpone) honestly, we don't have much leverage since all cricket boards/nations are bleeding financially.
All the more reason not to get in each other's way. Then everyone can get maximum international eyeballs.
Someone like Jake Fraser-McGurk should get heaps out of playing BBL. Being on national TV, being in pressure situations, access to quality international players - even just switching between formats, which he'll have to do as his career progresses.For the young guys you mention not sure whether this type of cricket helps in their developments in the longer form of the game and I presume a young guy like Bryce Street would not play it and would go back to club cricket which would be better for him.Some good examples of young guys playing it at the moment would be guys like Sutherland and Jake Fraser Mc Gurk.
Thunder v Sixers
Seven: 901,000 (Metro 604,000 Regional 297,000)
Fox Cricket: 209,000/180,000 (1st and 2nd innings)
Doesn't include streaming figures, either. It's as much a ratings juggernaut as ever. Renders complaints about the quality of the players, and comparisons to other leagues, irrelevant.
Over a million people. And there's rarely anything else on TV at this time of year worth watching. That's why networks spend a lot of money for the BBL rights. Thankfully so because it's a much more reliable revenue stream, especially in a climate where even crowds for the Boxing Day Test are well down.Because a few people put the TV on a public holiday with nothing else on? Yet they won’t spend any money to actually go to a game.
Over a million people. And there's rarely anything else on TV at this time of year worth watching. That's why networks spend a lot of money for the BBL rights. Thankfully so because it's a much more reliable revenue stream, especially in a climate where even crowds for the Boxing Day Test are well down.
We all understand you want to go back to the state comp (which had one 30k+ crowd in its entire history) because your Stars can't win finals (unlike the Renegades!), but it ain't gonna happen.
And in the words of Neil Diamond “money talks”cricket boards are ruled by self-interest now.
It’s too late to turn back now…CA is addicted to the coin, as is every other nation. Look at the Poms, ****ed a great system by introducing a Mickey Mouse version of T-20, introduced by my former teammate Tom Harrison, completely $$ related, it’s no longer about teaching kids how to play to enjoy and love the game, it’s about making them into consumersI don't profess to be a BBL fan, the genre does nothing for me.
But I agree that the season is just too long. First match - 5th December. Final - 28th January. That's the best part of two months.
I've seen it mentioned somewhere else on BF how the English f-c season is split to accommodate 20/20 cricket. But even there the gap for 20/20 is only one month (June), not two like here.
And I find it absurd that you have the Tests being played with NO first-class cricket being played at the same time. It's okay for the regular Test players, but what about a replacement player selected late in the Test series? They won't have played f-c cricket since late November, and accordingly will be plucked from either the BBL or from Grade cricket. Hardly ideal preparation for a Test match.
CA can't continue to treat Shield cricket as a second banana to the BBL and expect to maintain a quality Test side imo. Things are holding at present, but eventually they will crack. The balance between 20/20 and the Shield needs to be restored.
Forever in blue jeans......And in the words of Neil Diamond “money talks”
Still playing grade over here.What's Craig Simmons doing these days ?
I agree. I can't see CA's policies ending well for the game overall.It’s too late to turn back now…CA is addicted to the coin, as is every other nation. Look at the Poms, f’ed a great system by introducing a Mickey Mouse version of T-20, introduced by my former teammate Tom Harrison, completely $$ related, it’s no longer about teaching kids how to play to enjoy and love the game, it’s about making them into consumers
Someone like Jake Fraser-McGurk should get heaps out of playing BBL. Being on national TV, being in pressure situations, access to quality international players - even just switching between formats, which he'll have to do as his career progresses.
If T20 didn't exist he'd likely be playing Shield against the likes of Steve Smith and Pat Cummins on a regular basis. I'd consider that more valuable then rubbing shoulders with some Afghan Players and James Vince, no disrespect to them.