HBF
Flying Scotsman
- Sep 24, 2002
- 156,226
- 101,328
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Well that was a brutal read, but I got through it in the end.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Silvagni mentioned it as an option in the interview.
So was our future 2nd & 3rd for an uncontracted player who got dropped twice and wants out
Thanks for the insight N17.I’m a lifelong Carlton supporter and I’ve been a Suns member for 6 years due to location so I’ve seen a lot of Jack Martin. But I have bitten my tongue (well keyboard) while this trade period has played out so I’m now going to give my honest appraisal of what has just occurred.
He was my favourite player early on based on a few very good games in the early years because he had amazing potential.
However .... he has consistently played about 4 decent games per year and teases with his potential, then goes missing for weeks at a time where he just seemed like he wasn’t interested at all, wouldn’t chase, tackle, or put his head over the ball to make a contest.
He is such a conditional player and chooses when to have a go and when he just can’t give a toss.
On numerous occasions this year I said that the Suns just needed to trade him while he still had some currency because he was playing like someone who clearly didn’t care and didn’t want to be at the club. I jokingly said to my wife that they can piss him off as long as he didn’t end up at Carlton ... then he nominated us and I just shook my head and said “for goodness sake I hope we don’t give up too much for him”.
What happened with Martin today is a very good outcome.
He is not worth a 1st round pick
He is not worth sliding back in the first round, and IMO ... (and in the case of any Suns players, for once I think my opinion counts for something) ...
He isn’t worth a 2nd round pick under 30
So SOS was 100% right not to be bent over on the Martin deal and if he plays another season like this year, he’d be a 4th rounder at best next year because of his give a toss attitude.
This is why GCS surely couldn’t entertain redrafting him in the PSD because they can’t afford to bring him back against his wishes on decent money, just to put up mediocre performances and drag down the club while they’re trying to improve their culture.
They had to make a stand, but it won’t help them in the end. Unfortunately we were in the breach on the occasion that they decided to do so. They have definitely put their club before the player, who I suspect will come out and say (via his manager) that he would rather sit out of footy that return to the Suns after what has occurred.
If we get him in the PSD fine. But SOS & Co. did the right thing today
As for Papley .... what can you do? He is contracted and Swans didn’t want to play ball.
We haven’t compromised by going after lesser quality targets and we haven’t given away the farm for the ones we wanted.
He won't nominate for national draft
Sent from my CPH1879 using Tapatalk
Wonder if we will do something funky like trade pick 9 for a couple of first rounders next year in order to load up for another crack at a big player next year. Guess it depends on what's available at pick 9 and potential trade targets next year.
Should have given Richmond pick 9 for martin - oh wait he wasn't available.......just like papley
Sent from my CPH1879 using Tapatalk
Silvagni mentioned "pre season draft" in the interview.
Comprehension.
ATO love this idea
See ya!,
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
Bye bye
In summing everything up:
Papley - Contracted for another 3 years. Sydney wanted much more than pick 9. That’s way overs and SOS and crew didn’t buckle.
Martin - Gold Coast wanted a future 1st and 2nd round pick for an UN-CONTRACTED Martin and pick 15. This is for a bloke who once has had 30 touches and finished off the year in their reserves. Once again SOS and crew didn’t buckle and we will get him for next to nothing in the draft or PSD.
Blues were done over.
AFL complicit in the shafting we received by the Gold Coast Suns, told they needed to flex their muscle and harden up.
Very obvious many in here have never been involved in a commercial negotiation of any significance.
Do you still trade based on potential 100 games into a career? Surely clubs take that sort of risk for 18 year olds with the junior pedigree, not 25 year olds living off that junior pedigree? It would be akin to Port Adelaide trading Pick 9 for Jack Watts because he was a number one draft pick 8 years prior.