Gethelred
Moderator
- May 1, 2016
- 31,342
- 60,457
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #4,176
I'm actually all for them taking him.You may be right, he isn’t exactly the prototype player they normally recruit and develop to play their brand but it’s just a hunch and i think he’s too good a player for them to not take ‘if’ he was keen on them...
They lucked into discovering a system that worked well enough for them to win 3 flags, and they spent the time during that trying to cover their weaknesses (ie, recruiting players to win contested ball, a second KPF to compensate for the lack). They went from dynamic and (above all else) different to trying for conventional; win the tap, win the clearance, kick forward. Only problem is, their game was completely about sacrificing first possession to allow you to sustain tackling pressure for the entire rest of the game; it let the lesser lights contribute more easily, took advantage of their tackling techniques to bring opposition players to ground and allow the cascading outnumbers to a now loose ball, and it let the good players rest for longer early in games so they could blow you apart later. Mistake they went for last year early and this year all season: they're trying to stop teams from beating them by winning the ball first.
Only problem is, you cannot sustain that level of pressure unless you're willing to make it the centre of your game; if you're trying to win the ball, you're not standing in the same spot you were when you were just interested in tackling the bloke who has it to ground, and you've actually got to read the ball a bit better, and you've got to work harder to compensate for your positioning if you lose the tap and/or possession. They then have to work harder and all of a sudden they're not belting blokes out of the way or running teams off their feet anymore. They're the ones who now can't run a game out.
He is an attempt to go in this direction further than they have even now. They take him, they're not trying to play the way they won 3 flags; they're trying to play the way St Kilda did under Ratts last year.
I don't think the Richmond dynasty will hang around the way Geelong, Sydney and Hawthorn did. I think they lucked into something that worked and worked well, they didn't know why or how it worked until it did, and now they've gone too far in trying to compensate for supposed weaknesses that they've discarded what made them strong in the first place.