Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Yep - they did the same with Wellman who got in over Couzins and what happened? Our VFL team & development focus went to shit. These ex-players are not the answer.
Pssst. Cousins was president when that happened.
 
It's unnecessary? Like no other AFL club has a VFL president. Or SANFL president etc.

It'd be like a local club having a "men's president" and a "women's president". It's one club, there's one president.
 
It's unnecessary? Like no other AFL club has a VFL president. Or SANFL president etc.

It'd be like a local club having a "men's president" and a "women's president". It's one club, there's one president.
I don't mind it. Gives attention to the individual programs.
 
I don't mind it. Gives attention to the individual programs.
Does it? I thought it was simply because the board wanted Cousins still around so created a pointless job to do so.

I honestly don't see it. You have a VFL GM, a VFL recruiting department, specific VFL coaches. These guys generally have nothing to do with the AFL program.
 
Does it? I thought it was simply because the board wanted Cousins still around so created a pointless job to do so.

I honestly don't see it. You have a VFL GM, a VFL recruiting department, specific VFL coaches. These guys generally have nothing to do with the AFL program.
Yeah I think it does. AFL President can't be everywhere doing everything.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yeah I think it does. AFL President can't be everywhere doing everything.
That's why you have general managers doing most of the day to day work and reporting to the CEO/President.
 
What's in a name? If it's the same role with a different name does it matter?
It isn't though. We have a VFL GM who still does that stuff but all it essentially does is add another layer of unnecessary oversight.
 
It isn't though. We have a VFL GM who still does that stuff but all it essentially does is add another layer of unnecessary oversight.
If you think your VFL GM needs a president to manage them you’ve probably given the job to the wrong person imo
 
That's why you have general managers doing most of the day to day work and reporting to the CEO/President.
General Managers don't do the same thing as Presidents though.

🤷‍♂️ I think it's ok Eth.
 
Does anyone know why the board has the view that the proposed constitutional amendment to acknowledge the damage of pokie machines would reduce revenue and put the club at a ‘competitive disadvantage’ relative to the rest of the comp? Seems like a huge leap, and a deliberate misinterpretation of the proposal.


It’s not like they are asking them to drop pokies altogether. It’s simply asking them to make a bigger statement against their destructive influence on a vulnerable part of the community. Seems like a very mild constitutional change to me. Or am I missing something?
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know why the board has the view that the proposed constitutional amendment to acknowledge the damage of pokie machines would reduce revenue and put the club at a ‘competitive disadvantage’ relative to the rest of the comp? Seems like a huge leap, and a deliberate misinterpretation of the proposal.


It’s not like they are asking them to drop pokies altogether. It’s simply asking them to make a bigger statement against their destructive influence on a vulnerable part of the community. Seems like a very mild constitutional change to me. Or am I missing something?
it’s a slippery slope- first you acknowledge the damage they cause, next thing you’ll want to avoid the damage they cause, next thing you know you’ll remove them completely
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top